OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
169311950 5 days ago

Also NAIP

167226935 9 days ago

Hey pittrichimica,
Please do not add false bridges such as osm.org/way/1392368068. I would appreciate a comment acknowledging that you saw this.
Thanks,
BubbaJuice

168511768 23 days ago

And USGS 3DEP!

167929484 about 1 month ago

DOI link:
https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20173035

163974826 4 months ago

Thanks for contributing!

164226429 4 months ago

Apologies for the large changeset

163928585 4 months ago

Note as well that the forest service doc has trails that are being declared as no-longer maintained, but because I'm unaware of the validity of this in 2025, I am leaving them marked as operated by the Forest Service.

163928585 4 months ago

as well as https://arizona-content.usedirect.com/storage/Catalina-Trail-Map-2025.pdf

163918457 4 months ago

See more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%CA%BCodham_language

162587725 5 months ago

https://azdot.gov/news/adot-reopens-improved-i-10-orange-grove-interchange (and survey)
https://docs.tep.com/wp-content/uploads/TEP-Ten-Year-Plan-Transmission-Projects-2023-2032-Maps.pdf

160551877 7 months ago

Go ahead and remove it, I must have accidently pressed the balloon or shrink-wrap key.
Thank you.

160518309 7 months ago

Also bing streetview

158714540 8 months ago

Hello,
I understand by having "SRP" in the name of these substations may make it easier to identify the operator, however, that is not their name. Please refrain from doing this.
Thank you,
BubbaJuice

151583544 12 months ago

Hello Cooper,

Are these railroads real?

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

154358465 12 months ago

Also here are some examples of good and bad:
Good (remaining grade): osm.org/way/1192768798
Bad (no trace): osm.org/way/1303525751#map=18/44.76574/-85.62568

154358465 12 months ago

Hi cmxn,

The general consensus in the community is that only railways with remaining remnants on the ground (such as a remaining grade as the bar minimum) should be mapped. Otherwise, these "abandoned" railways should not be mapped. However, this kind of work is perfect for OpenHistoricalMap at openhistoricalmap.org. There's some discussion on it here, if you're interested: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposing-to-deprecate-railway-razed-and-railway-dismantled/109679/64

I will probably delete the railways that you have mapped in a week or so or whenever you have had time to move them over to OHM.

Thanks, BubbaJuice

146657145 about 1 year ago

Hello,

Please do not remove detail from the map. I will be reverting this changeset.

146998485 about 1 year ago

Most of this track exists, why did you delete the whole thing?

147200472 about 1 year ago

No, it isn't. I recommend you check resources before deleting buildings that you have only have the story about. https://www.shopfoothillsmall.com/

150732031 about 1 year ago

What's your source for the refs of some of these power towers?
For example: osm.org/node/688865222