Lògo d'OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Changeset Quand Comentari
169311950 ier 5 de jorns

Also NAIP

167226935 ier 9 de jorns

Hey pittrichimica,
Please do not add false bridges such as osm.org/way/1392368068. I would appreciate a comment acknowledging that you saw this.
Thanks,
BubbaJuice

168511768 ier 23 de jorns

And USGS 3DEP!

167929484 fa près de 1 mes

DOI link:
https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20173035

163974826 fa près de 4 de mes

Thanks for contributing!

164226429 fa près de 4 de mes

Apologies for the large changeset

163928585 fa près de 4 de mes

Note as well that the forest service doc has trails that are being declared as no-longer maintained, but because I'm unaware of the validity of this in 2025, I am leaving them marked as operated by the Forest Service.

163928585 fa près de 4 de mes

as well as https://arizona-content.usedirect.com/storage/Catalina-Trail-Map-2025.pdf

163918457 fa près de 4 de mes

See more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%CA%BCodham_language

162587725 fa près de 5 de mes

https://azdot.gov/news/adot-reopens-improved-i-10-orange-grove-interchange (and survey)
https://docs.tep.com/wp-content/uploads/TEP-Ten-Year-Plan-Transmission-Projects-2023-2032-Maps.pdf

160551877 fa près de 7 de mes

Go ahead and remove it, I must have accidently pressed the balloon or shrink-wrap key.
Thank you.

160518309 fa près de 7 de mes

Also bing streetview

158714540 fa près de 8 de mes

Hello,
I understand by having "SRP" in the name of these substations may make it easier to identify the operator, however, that is not their name. Please refrain from doing this.
Thank you,
BubbaJuice

151583544 fa près de 12 de mes

Hello Cooper,

Are these railroads real?

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

154358465 fa près de 12 de mes

Also here are some examples of good and bad:
Good (remaining grade): osm.org/way/1192768798
Bad (no trace): osm.org/way/1303525751#map=18/44.76574/-85.62568

154358465 fa près de 12 de mes

Hi cmxn,

The general consensus in the community is that only railways with remaining remnants on the ground (such as a remaining grade as the bar minimum) should be mapped. Otherwise, these "abandoned" railways should not be mapped. However, this kind of work is perfect for OpenHistoricalMap at openhistoricalmap.org. There's some discussion on it here, if you're interested: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposing-to-deprecate-railway-razed-and-railway-dismantled/109679/64

I will probably delete the railways that you have mapped in a week or so or whenever you have had time to move them over to OHM.

Thanks, BubbaJuice

146657145 fa près de 1 an

Hello,

Please do not remove detail from the map. I will be reverting this changeset.

146998485 fa près de 1 an

Most of this track exists, why did you delete the whole thing?

147200472 fa près de 1 an

No, it isn't. I recommend you check resources before deleting buildings that you have only have the story about. https://www.shopfoothillsmall.com/

150732031 fa près de 1 an

What's your source for the refs of some of these power towers?
For example: osm.org/node/688865222