Logotip de l'OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Changeset Quan Comentari
169311950 fa 5 dies

Also NAIP

167226935 fa 9 dies

Hey pittrichimica,
Please do not add false bridges such as osm.org/way/1392368068. I would appreciate a comment acknowledging that you saw this.
Thanks,
BubbaJuice

168511768 fa 23 dies

And USGS 3DEP!

167929484 fa 1 mes aproximadament

DOI link:
https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20173035

163974826 fa 4 mesos

Thanks for contributing!

164226429 fa 4 mesos

Apologies for the large changeset

163928585 fa 4 mesos

Note as well that the forest service doc has trails that are being declared as no-longer maintained, but because I'm unaware of the validity of this in 2025, I am leaving them marked as operated by the Forest Service.

163928585 fa 4 mesos

as well as https://arizona-content.usedirect.com/storage/Catalina-Trail-Map-2025.pdf

163918457 fa 4 mesos

See more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%CA%BCodham_language

162587725 fa 5 mesos

https://azdot.gov/news/adot-reopens-improved-i-10-orange-grove-interchange (and survey)
https://docs.tep.com/wp-content/uploads/TEP-Ten-Year-Plan-Transmission-Projects-2023-2032-Maps.pdf

160551877 fa 7 mesos

Go ahead and remove it, I must have accidently pressed the balloon or shrink-wrap key.
Thank you.

160518309 fa 7 mesos

Also bing streetview

158714540 fa 8 mesos

Hello,
I understand by having "SRP" in the name of these substations may make it easier to identify the operator, however, that is not their name. Please refrain from doing this.
Thank you,
BubbaJuice

151583544 fa 12 mesos

Hello Cooper,

Are these railroads real?

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

154358465 fa 12 mesos

Also here are some examples of good and bad:
Good (remaining grade): osm.org/way/1192768798
Bad (no trace): osm.org/way/1303525751#map=18/44.76574/-85.62568

154358465 fa 12 mesos

Hi cmxn,

The general consensus in the community is that only railways with remaining remnants on the ground (such as a remaining grade as the bar minimum) should be mapped. Otherwise, these "abandoned" railways should not be mapped. However, this kind of work is perfect for OpenHistoricalMap at openhistoricalmap.org. There's some discussion on it here, if you're interested: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposing-to-deprecate-railway-razed-and-railway-dismantled/109679/64

I will probably delete the railways that you have mapped in a week or so or whenever you have had time to move them over to OHM.

Thanks, BubbaJuice

146657145 fa 1 any aproximadament

Hello,

Please do not remove detail from the map. I will be reverting this changeset.

146998485 fa 1 any aproximadament

Most of this track exists, why did you delete the whole thing?

147200472 fa 1 any aproximadament

No, it isn't. I recommend you check resources before deleting buildings that you have only have the story about. https://www.shopfoothillsmall.com/

150732031 fa 1 any aproximadament

What's your source for the refs of some of these power towers?
For example: osm.org/node/688865222