Logo de OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Gruppo de modificationes Quando Commento
169311950 5 dies retro

Also NAIP

167226935 9 dies retro

Hey pittrichimica,
Please do not add false bridges such as osm.org/way/1392368068. I would appreciate a comment acknowledging that you saw this.
Thanks,
BubbaJuice

168511768 23 dies retro

And USGS 3DEP!

167929484 circa 1 mense retro

DOI link:
https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20173035

163974826 4 menses retro

Thanks for contributing!

164226429 4 menses retro

Apologies for the large changeset

163928585 4 menses retro

Note as well that the forest service doc has trails that are being declared as no-longer maintained, but because I'm unaware of the validity of this in 2025, I am leaving them marked as operated by the Forest Service.

163928585 4 menses retro

as well as https://arizona-content.usedirect.com/storage/Catalina-Trail-Map-2025.pdf

163918457 4 menses retro

See more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%CA%BCodham_language

162587725 5 menses retro

https://azdot.gov/news/adot-reopens-improved-i-10-orange-grove-interchange (and survey)
https://docs.tep.com/wp-content/uploads/TEP-Ten-Year-Plan-Transmission-Projects-2023-2032-Maps.pdf

160551877 7 menses retro

Go ahead and remove it, I must have accidently pressed the balloon or shrink-wrap key.
Thank you.

160518309 7 menses retro

Also bing streetview

158714540 8 menses retro

Hello,
I understand by having "SRP" in the name of these substations may make it easier to identify the operator, however, that is not their name. Please refrain from doing this.
Thank you,
BubbaJuice

151583544 12 menses retro

Hello Cooper,

Are these railroads real?

Thanks,
BubbaJuice

154358465 12 menses retro

Also here are some examples of good and bad:
Good (remaining grade): osm.org/way/1192768798
Bad (no trace): osm.org/way/1303525751#map=18/44.76574/-85.62568

154358465 12 menses retro

Hi cmxn,

The general consensus in the community is that only railways with remaining remnants on the ground (such as a remaining grade as the bar minimum) should be mapped. Otherwise, these "abandoned" railways should not be mapped. However, this kind of work is perfect for OpenHistoricalMap at openhistoricalmap.org. There's some discussion on it here, if you're interested: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposing-to-deprecate-railway-razed-and-railway-dismantled/109679/64

I will probably delete the railways that you have mapped in a week or so or whenever you have had time to move them over to OHM.

Thanks, BubbaJuice

146657145 circa 1 anno retro

Hello,

Please do not remove detail from the map. I will be reverting this changeset.

146998485 circa 1 anno retro

Most of this track exists, why did you delete the whole thing?

147200472 circa 1 anno retro

No, it isn't. I recommend you check resources before deleting buildings that you have only have the story about. https://www.shopfoothillsmall.com/

150732031 circa 1 anno retro

What's your source for the refs of some of these power towers?
For example: osm.org/node/688865222