BubbaJuice's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
115878766 | over 3 years ago | Thanks. In particular, what is the source of the name of osm.org/way/1013843427? |
115878766 | over 3 years ago | What is the source of the names of these cemeteries? |
117223770 | over 3 years ago | Source: USGS 3DEP |
116262374 | over 3 years ago | Sources: Ersi World Imagery; Mapbox Satellite; USGS 3DEP; Bing aerial imagery |
115019477 | over 3 years ago | Hello aznative, Thank you for your contributions to the database. However, you have made a mistake in tagging all of the Tonto National Forest into a farmyard. This is incorrect because not all of the forest is a farmyard. A portion of it could be a farmyard but not the whole thing. This one separate portion would deserve its own way. I will be changing its tagging back to before this changeset. Thank you,
|
114860271 | over 3 years ago | Noticed I forgot to add sources, here they are: National Agricultural Imagery Program; Ersi World Imagery (Clarity); Maxar Premium Imagery; Ohio Statewide Imagery 1 ft |
112720154 | over 3 years ago | Hello Dylansc, The Broadway Underpass should not be tagged as a tunnel. It should either be a bridge or a tunnel, not both. It is clear that Broadway cutts through the earth that Toole Avenue was set on but Toole Avenue clearly has a bridge over this cut through earth. Tunnels are normally enclosed also, this has a large gap in the middle of it separating the bridges of the railroad and Toole Avenue. I will be changing this back to how it was. Thank you,
|
114238156 | over 3 years ago | Said iD changeset: osm.org/changeset/114238402 |
113305103 | over 3 years ago | Hello 1T_money, Splitting ways to make them shorter literally serves no purpose unless you are editing the area and the way you are editing becomes over 2000 nodes long. You have caused an inconvenience to me because I have a lot of unpublished changes in this area and I got one big conflict because of this. Please reconsider this next time. Thank you, BubbaJuice |
113305120 | over 3 years ago | Hello 1T_money, Splitting ways to make them shorter literally serves no purpose unless you are editing the area and the way you are editing becomes over 2000 nodes long. You have caused an inconvenience to me because I have a lot of unpublished changes in this area and I got one big conflict because of this. Please reconsider this next time. Thank you, BubbaJuice |
113178979 | almost 4 years ago | Please do not tag buildings as street lamps as you did so here: osm.org/node/9213149506 |
112855521 | almost 4 years ago | You can use a note as a placeholder. They can be created on the right hand side of the page at openstreetmap.org. You should resolve them once you are done using the note as a placeholder though. |
112879996 | almost 4 years ago | Hello wombatmaper, You did not do this task correctly. The task description states "Convert reservoir nodes in Arizona to areas tagged natural=water + water=reservoir" when you simply just converted a node to updated tagging. Please copy the tags from this node to the reservoir imported by NHD not far north east of this node please. If you are interested, the number two tank nodes goes to the tank even farther northeast. Thank you,
|
112353035 | almost 4 years ago | Hello GREGMAP1, In this changeset you added buildings that were not traced exactly on the buildings that were shown on Bing aerial imagery. Could you align all of your buildings with Bing aerial imagery? How you would do this is have Bing aerial imagery selected in the iD editor and then use the area tool to trace around the exact edge of the building until it reflected the exact area around the building. You would not lazily trace the outside of the building. After this could you press "q" to square the building? This will allow for accurate buildings that reflect the real world. Regarding the park nodes you have added in this changeset, what are the purpose of these? Why did you add them? Why are they named "1", "2", and "3"? Why have you added nodes like these all across Tucson? A response would be greatly appreciated. Thank you,
|
110041684 | almost 4 years ago | Hey GREGMAP1, In this changeset you added some highway links to intersections. Some of these highway links should be removed though. This is because these roads should only be created if physical separation is present (ie. a median or bollards). However the ones that you added only have strips of paint indicating lanes. Therefore they should be deleted. If you could leave a comment saying that you got this message that would be great. Thanks,
|
112343381 | almost 4 years ago | Hey GREGMAP1, The street lamps you added in this changeset should not be tagged with man_made=mast as they are typical street lamps and not masts. This also implies that tower:type=lighting should be removed. If you could do this on all of your most recent changesets that would be great.
If you could lave a response to confirm you got this message that would be great. Thanks,
|
10958386 | almost 4 years ago | Hey MojaveNC,
|
110756661 | almost 4 years ago | Hey martinmatejek, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I am contacting you because the websites you are adding to these hotels are not correct. booking.com links are not correct because it is not the hotel's official website, but simply a way to rent a spot at a hotel. Points of Interest like hotels should have the website as their official website. For example, in the hotel you edited in this changeset the website should have been https://midamcorp.com/hotels/apcap, the hotel's official website. Thanks, BubbaJuice |
110043142 | almost 4 years ago | *Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta |
109601263 | almost 4 years ago | Didn't link the changeset: osm.org/changeset/99411849 |