I have made multiple comments on changesets regarding the partial overlap of areas (specifically the putting green and fairway), but you have not heeded the advice or responded to the changeset comments.

Previous changeset comment identifying similar issue(s): osm.org/changeset/141233975
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141447876

Do not partially overlap areas. I have gone through and fixed this one along with several other changesets of yours. Please pay more attention in the future.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141447494

Do not overlap areas, such as what you did for the fairways and putting greens. This throws error flags.

What's the reason for not adding the cartpath bridges over the water? Specifically the segment by Piper Road?

"Private" driveways should not be deleted. Access tags should be used instead.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141409297

I already commented many times regarding partially overlapping landcover areas.

I have already commented on multiple changesets regarding partially overlapping features, specifically the greens and fairways. Please stop this practice.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141385764

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/141443650

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/141443650

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/141443650

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/141443650

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/141443650

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/141443650

'This changeset has been reverted. Access tags should be used instead. Read why "private" ways won'"'"'t be deleted here:
osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property'

osm.org/changeset/141443650

User readded these no longer existing features. I have gone through and removed the ones that don't exist.

These railway features do not exist (at least anymore). These no longer existing features should be added to OpenHistoricalMaps where it can live on forever. OHM is designed for historical features.

Since these "abandoned/razed" railways gave been completely removed, they should not be added to OSM. These ways should be removed, and instead be added to OHM.

osm.wiki/Good_practice#:~:text=also%3A%20ground%20truth-,Don%27t%20map%20historic%20events%20and%20historic%20features,-Do%20not%20map

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#:~:text=Place%20where%20railway,can%20be%20mapped.

Do not create "fake" holes by "lollipopping" areas. Multi-polygon relations should be used instead...

Do not map areas such that they partially overlap. The green should either not overlap with the fairway or it should be wholly within the fairway. I have gone ahead and fixed it, but - please be more careful of this in the future.

Partial overlaps throw all sorts of error flags, thus requiring more scrutiny.

Looks good!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141357041

Additionally, after reviewing your previous changesets, I have already asked you to use better changeset comments.