osm.org/?way=135724062 This is not “redaction”-related. It’s as if the nodes were never added to the rendering database.
OpenStreetMap
osm.org/?way=135724062 This is not “redaction”-related. It’s as if the nodes were never added to the rendering database.
Kaozeadenn
Evezhiadenn a-berzh aseerel4c26 d'an 22 September 2012 da 12:58
The nodes are in the DB somehow, otherwise your way= link wouldn’t be able to draw the blue line in the correct round shape. Also you see them in an editor. Example node of this way.
I could not find out why the default renderer misses some nodes of this way. Compare with other renderers (which may use older data).
Evezhiadenn a-berzh NE2 d'an 22 September 2012 da 13:08
The nodes are certainly in the OSM database. But they’re somehow not in the Mapnik database.
Evezhiadenn a-berzh Minh Nguyen d'an 22 September 2012 da 22:50
I’ve seen this behavior on occasion a few times on I-275 around Sharonville, Ohio, where one of the two carriageways incorrectly straightens out, crisscrossing the other. The problem tends to resolve itself after a few weeks. I’ve never seen it this bad or on motorway_links, though.
Evezhiadenn a-berzh aseerel4c26 d'an 22 September 2012 da 22:55
“Solved” now (the hard, not nice way): rickmastfan67 has deleted the old way and added a new way.