osm.org/?way=135724062 This is not “redaction”-related. It’s as if the nodes were never added to the rendering database.
OpenStreetMap
osm.org/?way=135724062 This is not “redaction”-related. It’s as if the nodes were never added to the rendering database.
Discussion
Cummentu dae aseerel4c26 de su 22 cabudanni 2012 a is 12:58
The nodes are in the DB somehow, otherwise your way= link wouldn’t be able to draw the blue line in the correct round shape. Also you see them in an editor. Example node of this way.
I could not find out why the default renderer misses some nodes of this way. Compare with other renderers (which may use older data).
Cummentu dae NE2 de su 22 cabudanni 2012 a is 13:08
The nodes are certainly in the OSM database. But they’re somehow not in the Mapnik database.
Cummentu dae Minh Nguyen de su 22 cabudanni 2012 a is 22:50
I’ve seen this behavior on occasion a few times on I-275 around Sharonville, Ohio, where one of the two carriageways incorrectly straightens out, crisscrossing the other. The problem tends to resolve itself after a few weeks. I’ve never seen it this bad or on motorway_links, though.
Cummentu dae aseerel4c26 de su 22 cabudanni 2012 a is 22:55
“Solved” now (the hard, not nice way): rickmastfan67 has deleted the old way and added a new way.