Rückgängig gemacht in osm.org/changeset/63867551 – Man kann nicht sagen, dass man das Tagging aufräumt und dann bei mehren Anschlussgleisen das service=spur vergessen. Vorher war's weniger falsch!

Hi peace2,

when there is no inner polygon you don't need a multipolygon relation.

Regards

M!dgard stated publicly "i removed an undocumented, fairly low-usage, nonsensical tag to avoid it showing up in iD" -> that's not a valid reason to remove something by a mechanical edit, so I've reverted this in osm.org/changeset/62612995

BTW there have been more than 700 occurrences by several users.

Demolished buildings

Hej. Det visste jag inte.

@NKA: By which changeset? I've wanted to replace this bogus import, which has mainly wrong geometries (see the forests), with new data. You've simply been too fast in reverting.

I've checked this in detail: The account has only removed very small PGS fragments, which are irretrievably broken. They are no benefit for remapping.

Do you know this tag osm.wiki/Tag:irrigation%3Dpivot ?

@nikasth: You've mapped several wind turbines as duplicates directly beneath pre-existing wind mills. Example:

osm.org/node/1824857437 - osm.org/node/5176647130 (your dupe)

What are you changing when you just write a "."?

Please read this and act!

Ok, I'm sorry. Actually I've changed my mapping habits because of complaints by some German users.
Before I've mapped the same way like you. These forest pieces are clearly planted and not native forests.

Thanks for your advice!

I'm now using the "Download along" tool from JOSM to delete this ways again, but this is huge data and JOSM is just eating up all my memory. Please give me a little bit more time.

Hi Nick,

I doubt, that there are any 500 kV lines in Puerto Rico. I've just falsely accusated someone else (osm.org/changeset/52834243), which told me you as source of this.

Greetings

Hi Verdy_p,

do you really think, that there is a 500 kV power line in Puerto Rico?

Greetings

You've changed relations which had type=site to type=windfarm. I don't think, that this is according to the Wiki.

Sicher wäre Löschen sauberer,
ich benutze die Relation allerdings schon für eine Visualisierung der Netzausbaumaßnahmen in Deutschland. Vorgeschlagene Umgehungsstraßen, die dann nie kommen, dürfen doch auch in OSM bleiben?

Hallo aixbrick,

es tut mir Leid, dass ich nicht früher geantwortet habe. Jetzt weiß ich, dass man nicht vorbeugend mappen soll.

In Belgien wurde allerdings schon am 15. Januar 2018 mit den Baubarbeiten begonnen (http://www.elia.be/fr/projets/projets-reseau/alegro/alegro-de). Daher halte ich es für sinnvoll, den deutschen Abschnitt nicht mehr zu löschen, bis auch bei uns die Bauarbeiten beginnen.

Grüße

Hi Bhargav,

there is already a node for Mandeville: osm.org/node/290803556

To have an area and a node with the same name and features is wrong.

Best regards,
nehaj

Hi RichRico,

I've just wanted to get height profiles along these lines. I'm fine with the deletion.