It looks like that building is the bank? If so, these points can be merged by selecting both and pressing C

On osm.org/way/815700516 it looks like you've drawn a path over itself?

Streets should be added with the directions spelled out, rather than abbreviated (see also osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29)

Looks like you've also added one house in Eagle. In general, we try to keep changesets localized to a smaller area, as it makes them easier to review

This park was already added by osm.org/changeset/68281088

I don't think it's fair to call a usable language and its words "fictional".

It doesn't seem like it would be much less verifiable than most other translations

Is there an official policy for that?

Where is this source available?

Osmose is throwing warnings about 724829555 due to the `type=multipolygon` tag.

What did you mean to do here? Is combining barrier=fence and leisure=pitch useful?

This was previously discussed on osm.org/changeset/74670030

Added in 79781532

Is osm.org/way/645285354 intended to have an addr:housenumber value?

It's rather building-like, so probably either that or another building inside the area

Maybe not "need", but yes

If the road exists, it should be on the map. Issues with rendering should be addressed by the renderer.

It's probably worth adding an `access:conditional` tag to express that

I assume by "the key" you're referring to name?

What is meant by "layer=1;3"?

To quote the wiki:
> Note that there are also areas called "national parks," "landscape parks," or similar that may be shortened to "park." Such large, national-level (and state- and provincial-level in North America) parks not so designed and manicured, but rather left in a more wild and natural state should not get this tag, instead, use another tag like boundary=national_park

service= should correspond to more broad types of service roads, perhaps drive-through would be correct here? If the road is covered, the covered portion should be tagged with covered=yes