OpenStreetMap Logo OpenStreetMap

Änderungssatz Zeitpunkt Kommentar
73254654 vor über einem Jahr

I think I was under the impression that foot=use_sidepath was to be used for all sidewalks, but that does indeed seem not to be the case

especially for that road lol

146429251 vor über einem Jahr

or oh this is about new roads isn't it

146429251 vor über einem Jahr

apparently old projects get auto-removed so this is a new one

111361641 vor über 2 Jahren

must have forgotten to straighten those

or are you referring to something else?

117764882 vor etwa 3 Jahren

Is East Pennsylvania Lane supposed to be disconnected from Pennsylvania Drive?

97921654 vor über 3 Jahren

Looks like you've changed North Harris Ranch Road to South Harris Ranch Road in this changeset, is that intentional/correct?

106719698 vor etwa 4 Jahren

I see https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/2988 but it was closed

106719698 vor etwa 4 Jahren

Given that this changeset was created with StreetComplete, I'm not sure that's really their choice. Probably should be reported to StreetComplete as an issue

103558069 vor über 4 Jahren

also, where did you find newer aerial imagery?

103558069 vor über 4 Jahren

Spring Creek does meet Dry Creek at an angle: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gsGdhURYLrXiNvcjG3EcWr

possibly temporary, but it _is_ paved

103558069 vor über 4 Jahren

I believe it does, this is from a gpx track of driving on it

99415106 vor über 4 Jahren

note that for the purposes of this project, mapping sidewalks also includes any curbs at crossings

99399469 vor über 4 Jahren

no, this is all from imagery, I think the gpx file is a side effect of the way that damn opens iD

97649286 vor über 4 Jahren

What is the source for this data?

97013883 vor über 4 Jahren

don't really have any, was just making up tags in this case

77204212 vor über 4 Jahren

Looks like we have mapillary images here that show the name - corrected

96359245 vor über 4 Jahren

I think going with the signage would be better here as that's what's "on the ground"

77204212 vor über 4 Jahren

it's entirely possible that's wrong, probably worth surveying here again anyway to get the new streets

89755279 vor fast 5 Jahren

Hi, welcome to OSM!

To make this pathway more useful, it should be tagged with a feature type (probably highway=path) and connected to other paths & roads

89059222 vor etwa 5 Jahren

I would recommend against doing this, changesets over a large area are hard to review