Logo OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Changeset Bila Komen
73254654 lebih 1 tahun yang lalu

I think I was under the impression that foot=use_sidepath was to be used for all sidewalks, but that does indeed seem not to be the case

especially for that road lol

146429251 lebih 1 tahun yang lalu

or oh this is about new roads isn't it

146429251 lebih 1 tahun yang lalu

apparently old projects get auto-removed so this is a new one

111361641 lebih 2 tahun yang lalu

must have forgotten to straighten those

or are you referring to something else?

117764882 sekitar 3 tahun yang lalu

Is East Pennsylvania Lane supposed to be disconnected from Pennsylvania Drive?

97921654 lebih 3 tahun yang lalu

Looks like you've changed North Harris Ranch Road to South Harris Ranch Road in this changeset, is that intentional/correct?

106719698 sekitar 4 tahun yang lalu

I see https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/2988 but it was closed

106719698 sekitar 4 tahun yang lalu

Given that this changeset was created with StreetComplete, I'm not sure that's really their choice. Probably should be reported to StreetComplete as an issue

103558069 lebih 4 tahun yang lalu

also, where did you find newer aerial imagery?

103558069 lebih 4 tahun yang lalu

Spring Creek does meet Dry Creek at an angle: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gsGdhURYLrXiNvcjG3EcWr

possibly temporary, but it _is_ paved

103558069 lebih 4 tahun yang lalu

I believe it does, this is from a gpx track of driving on it

99415106 lebih 4 tahun yang lalu

note that for the purposes of this project, mapping sidewalks also includes any curbs at crossings

99399469 lebih 4 tahun yang lalu

no, this is all from imagery, I think the gpx file is a side effect of the way that damn opens iD

97649286 lebih 4 tahun yang lalu

What is the source for this data?

97013883 lebih 4 tahun yang lalu

don't really have any, was just making up tags in this case

77204212 lebih 4 tahun yang lalu

Looks like we have mapillary images here that show the name - corrected

96359245 lebih 4 tahun yang lalu

I think going with the signage would be better here as that's what's "on the ground"

77204212 lebih 4 tahun yang lalu

it's entirely possible that's wrong, probably worth surveying here again anyway to get the new streets

89755279 hampir 5 tahun yang lalu

Hi, welcome to OSM!

To make this pathway more useful, it should be tagged with a feature type (probably highway=path) and connected to other paths & roads

89059222 sekitar 5 tahun yang lalu

I would recommend against doing this, changesets over a large area are hard to review