OpenStreetMap-ан логотип OpenStreetMap

Changeset Маца Коммент
73254654 шарал кӀезга хьалха

I think I was under the impression that foot=use_sidepath was to be used for all sidewalks, but that does indeed seem not to be the case

especially for that road lol

146429251 шарал кӀезга хьалха

or oh this is about new roads isn't it

146429251 шарал кӀезга хьалха

apparently old projects get auto-removed so this is a new one

111361641 2шарал кӀезга хьалха

must have forgotten to straighten those

or are you referring to something else?

117764882 3 месех шо хьалха

Is East Pennsylvania Lane supposed to be disconnected from Pennsylvania Drive?

97921654 3шарал кӀезга хьалха

Looks like you've changed North Harris Ranch Road to South Harris Ranch Road in this changeset, is that intentional/correct?

106719698 4 месех шо хьалха

I see https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/2988 but it was closed

106719698 4 месех шо хьалха

Given that this changeset was created with StreetComplete, I'm not sure that's really their choice. Probably should be reported to StreetComplete as an issue

103558069 4шарал кӀезга хьалха

also, where did you find newer aerial imagery?

103558069 4шарал кӀезга хьалха

Spring Creek does meet Dry Creek at an angle: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gsGdhURYLrXiNvcjG3EcWr

possibly temporary, but it _is_ paved

103558069 4шарал кӀезга хьалха

I believe it does, this is from a gpx track of driving on it

99415106 4шарал кӀезга хьалха

note that for the purposes of this project, mapping sidewalks also includes any curbs at crossings

99399469 4шарал кӀезга хьалха

no, this is all from imagery, I think the gpx file is a side effect of the way that damn opens iD

97649286 4шарал кӀезга хьалха

What is the source for this data?

97013883 4шарал кӀезга хьалха

don't really have any, was just making up tags in this case

77204212 4шарал кӀезга хьалха

Looks like we have mapillary images here that show the name - corrected

96359245 4шарал кӀезга хьалха

I think going with the signage would be better here as that's what's "on the ground"

77204212 4шарал кӀезга хьалха

it's entirely possible that's wrong, probably worth surveying here again anyway to get the new streets

89755279 5 масех шо хьалха

Hi, welcome to OSM!

To make this pathway more useful, it should be tagged with a feature type (probably highway=path) and connected to other paths & roads

89059222 5 месех шо хьалха

I would recommend against doing this, changesets over a large area are hard to review