Лого на OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Changeset Кога Коментар
73254654 преди повече от година

I think I was under the impression that foot=use_sidepath was to be used for all sidewalks, but that does indeed seem not to be the case

especially for that road lol

146429251 преди повече от година

or oh this is about new roads isn't it

146429251 преди повече от година

apparently old projects get auto-removed so this is a new one

111361641 преди повече от 2 години

must have forgotten to straighten those

or are you referring to something else?

117764882 преди около 3 години

Is East Pennsylvania Lane supposed to be disconnected from Pennsylvania Drive?

97921654 преди повече от 3 години

Looks like you've changed North Harris Ranch Road to South Harris Ranch Road in this changeset, is that intentional/correct?

106719698 преди около 4 години

I see https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/2988 but it was closed

106719698 преди около 4 години

Given that this changeset was created with StreetComplete, I'm not sure that's really their choice. Probably should be reported to StreetComplete as an issue

103558069 преди повече от 4 години

also, where did you find newer aerial imagery?

103558069 преди повече от 4 години

Spring Creek does meet Dry Creek at an angle: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gsGdhURYLrXiNvcjG3EcWr

possibly temporary, but it _is_ paved

103558069 преди повече от 4 години

I believe it does, this is from a gpx track of driving on it

99415106 преди повече от 4 години

note that for the purposes of this project, mapping sidewalks also includes any curbs at crossings

99399469 преди повече от 4 години

no, this is all from imagery, I think the gpx file is a side effect of the way that damn opens iD

97649286 преди повече от 4 години

What is the source for this data?

97013883 преди повече от 4 години

don't really have any, was just making up tags in this case

77204212 преди повече от 4 години

Looks like we have mapillary images here that show the name - corrected

96359245 преди повече от 4 години

I think going with the signage would be better here as that's what's "on the ground"

77204212 преди повече от 4 години

it's entirely possible that's wrong, probably worth surveying here again anyway to get the new streets

89755279 преди почти 5 години

Hi, welcome to OSM!

To make this pathway more useful, it should be tagged with a feature type (probably highway=path) and connected to other paths & roads

89059222 преди около 5 години

I would recommend against doing this, changesets over a large area are hard to review