Shernott's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
24032816 | about 10 years ago | Hi Mathieu, "Bois du Jorat" is much larger than "Bois de Peccau", and the two are by no means identical. Fixed it in osm.org/changeset/32724780 Cheers,
|
25277353 | about 10 years ago | Hi Mathieu, access=no would block any kind of access, including pedestrians and horses, which would then have to be allowed explicitly too (like you did with bicycle=yes). A much simpler way is to use a more specific block: motor_vehicle=forestry. Fixed it in osm.org/changeset/32729267 Cheers,
|
25275657 | about 10 years ago | Hi Mathieu, access=no would block any kind of access, including pedestrians and horses, which would then have to be allowed explicitly too (like you did with bicycle=yes). A much simpler way is to use a more specific block: motor_vehicle=forestry. Fixed it in osm.org/changeset/32729267 Cheers,
|
29272536 | over 10 years ago | Voilà, c'est fait: osm.org/changeset/29662059 |
29272536 | over 10 years ago | Je peux m'en occuper un des ces jours, mais au moment j'ai des autres priorités hors de OSM. |
29272536 | over 10 years ago | Moi je serais plutôt pour inclure le petit bout de forêt au sud-est (en dessous des prairies clôturées). Les arbres et les sentiers là sont entretenues comme dans un parc. Et une fois la bonne forme trouvée, je serais pour détacher le forêt dans le parc du multipolygon "Forêt de Sauvabelin": Les deux au même temps me semblent d'être des concepts contradictoires, donc soit l'un, soit l'autre. |
29272536 | over 10 years ago | Alors laissons le parc sous sa forme actuelle. Highly efficient (re-)use of ways BTW... :-) |
25629654 | over 10 years ago | Sans doute c'est techniquement correct. Ma question va plutôt dans la direction de l'utilité par rapport au désagrément de les modifier (au cas ou) et de les entretenir. |
29272536 | over 10 years ago | Salut,
|
29272536 | over 10 years ago | Sur une seconde pensée, je pense je le Parc de l'Hermitage se limite à la partie au sud de la Fondation de l'Hermitage: http://www.lausanne.ch/thematiques/nature-et-domaines/espaces-verts/parcs-et-promenades/les-parcs-historiques/parc-de-l-hermitage.html
|
25629654 | over 10 years ago | Salut Mathieu,
|
29272536 | over 10 years ago | Salut Mathieu,
|
26716494 | over 10 years ago | Hi Hreid,
|
26716494 | over 10 years ago | Hi Hreid, I'm not quite sure what you intended to achieve here. But what I can see is that the track you entered doubled a sequence of already existing tracks, paths, and steps. Furthermore, around the Vivarium you distorted a parking place and moved the forking of a track/path to place where is doesn't belong. As far as I can see, it would be the best to revert the whole thing. What's your point of view? Cheers,
|