adamh's Comments

Changeset	Bila	Komen
141522309	hampir 2 tahun yang lalu	Where is this data sourced from? The changeset says "Esri World Imagery", which seems unlikely to be sufficient for the detail provided.
125676411	lebih 2 tahun yang lalu	If this is properly open now, then we should probably remove the access=no ?
120160050	sekitar 3 tahun yang lalu	Possible dupe of this node 40m away? osm.org/node/4395792106
112774557	lebih 3 tahun yang lalu	Are you sure the parking north of Casey Indoor Leisure Complex is 'private'? I don't recall seeing any particular restrictions in that area. It might possibly be 'customers'?
118931393	lebih 3 tahun yang lalu	Thanks for checking. The source on your changest is 'survey' - so I assumed you'd actually been there to verify. If you're mapping from imagery you should set the source appropriately.
118931393	lebih 3 tahun yang lalu	Isn't there a toilet block at the south of the carpark? Maybe this element should have been moved?
115587430	lebih 3 tahun yang lalu	The bridge that you've added is across the park boundary and not the stream. Are you sure you've drawn it in the correct location?
114543257	lebih 3 tahun yang lalu	2 Questions. Where are you sourcing the information for the location and nature of this historical (and now non-existent) rail infrastructure, as there's no source attribution? Given this rail infrastructure isn't visible on the ground any more and has been completely removed, shouldn't it be removed from the map?
114461750	lebih 3 tahun yang lalu	Hello Elly, welcome to OSM. I wondered where you got the name for the beach, as it's not possible to see the name in the aerial imagery? It's important that we only use data from permitted sources.
114341910	lebih 3 tahun yang lalu	What is your data source for the name of this beach?
113177403	lebih 3 tahun yang lalu	Welcome to OSM. The version of the running track that you've drawn does seem much nicer than what was before. However it is recommended to modify the existing ways rather than to delete and redraw. This history of changes is useful for knowing the source of contributions and respecting the work of those previous mappers. osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
113432061	lebih 3 tahun yang lalu	Hi there, welcome to OSM. This changeset includes different sorts of changes which are 150km apart. Generally it's recommended to keep your changesets as focused and local as possible. This one should probably be 2-3 changesets.
112261695	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	To be honest I'm not sure why these railway lines are even mapped. There's no source information for the original geometry. The lines and the route of the lines is not evident in the real world, there's a great big shopping centre and carpark there. osm.wiki/Tag:railway=abandoned says "A tag to map former railways, where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure." I'd say none of the mapped abandoned rail lines on the Mornington side of the Nepean highway meet this criteria. (General comments for all to respond on - not directed at you Ewen)
95801240	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	There's a clear mapillary image for one of them. The others are unclear in mapillary. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=794920641165298&lat=-37.945557237183&lng=144.99789445468&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.39344660239325757&y=0.7305136029809556&zoom=1.8575851393188856
112029131	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	I'd probably want to tag these as highway=residential and access=permissive.
112029131	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	There's mapillary imagery, although the sign is very hard to make out. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=831792124100124 I believe the top of the sign says "Central Park Estate. Private Property" The estate has fair coverage in mapillary, but the signs on the way in and out are skipped.
112030682	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	How did you source these changes? It's impossible to tell from Bing maps if a path is a cycle path, shared path, or walking only path. The path 31659577 is now walking only, and yet it forms part of a LCN cycling relation, and for years has been mapped as a cycle path. A small amount of searching gives us this map, which shows Hallam Road having a "Other Path Link" type with a bicycle and pedestrian illustrated. https://www.casey.vic.gov.au/hallam-valley-trail The more northern part of this path was changed from cycling to foot only by you some 30 days earlier.
111889860	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	There's archives of talk-au at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/
111889860	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	There are 30 modified ways in this changeset, mostly path->footway tag changes. What does this have to do with the changeset comment of "updates to cycling permission to align with Victoria Road Regulations" ?
95801240	hampir 4 tahun yang lalu	I've returned these 3 to bike=no