osm.wiki/Verifiability
osm.wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability

Are you sure the name of this place is "Fish & Chips"? I've added the `cuisine=fish_and_chips`
osm.org/node/2836055671

Is this ( osm.org/way/172067772 ) really have a name "Chipper"? I've added the `cuisine=fish_and_chips` which is the proper way to tag that

Did you mean to move this public toilet into the corner of this house?
osm.org/node/3750529753

Is the name of this place really "Fish & chips"? You can put `cuisine=fish_and_chips` to describe what sort of place it is, but the name bit should be a name

I don't think the name of this cafe is "amenity=cafe" 😉 I've changed it here. If I'm wrong, please put it back
osm.org/changeset/80440170

The number 11 is displayed twice because it is in the OSM database twice. First as a node ( osm.org/node/2586613723) and then the house has that number too ( osm.org/way/764025962 ).

I suggest deleting the node, and leaving the housenumber on the house

I don't think FB employees check RapiD edits. You can search for recent edits with OSMCha https://osmcha.mapbox.com/

OSM's strength is that the community provides quality assurances and checks the data. So we're all doing it out of "self interest". I'm sure other people are monitoring thigns toos

Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes?

Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes?

Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes?

Hi, I don't think you need RapiD for this change, right? Can you please use regular iD, because then it makes it easier for the community to review RapiD changes?

Hi, please don't use RapiD for this sort of change if you don't need to use the detected roads. It clogs up the list of edits to review, and makes more work for the community review team. Regular iD is better, because

Hallo. Bist du sicher? osm.org/way/763514589#map=18/48.77984/12.98008

There is nothing wrong with my editor. I have made an extension to do this

osm.org/user/%E1%9A%9B%E1%9A%8F%E1%9A%92%E1%9A%90%E1%9A%94%E1%9A%8F%E1%9A%94%E1%9A%8B%E1%9A%9C%20%F0%9F%8F%B3%EF%B8%8F%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8C%88/diary/42551

@Reino Thanks for your response. Please don't add `source=digitalglobe` to objects, the tag should ideally be on the changeset, not the object, but importantly, you shouldn't mislead other mappers about the source. if RapiD can't change that, then don't use it.

@toplusitania Thanks for your feedback. I don't know the area, so wasn't sure from aerial.

It sounds like RapiD shouldn't be used?

Hi. Are you familiar with this area? I've looked at some of the tracks that you've added, and from the Bing & ESRI, they certainly look like linear features, but RapiD can be be very eager, and guess tracks too much. Are you familiar with this area, and can you confirm those are tracks, or where you trusting RapiD entirely?

You added `source=digitialglobe` to all objects, but your changeset says otherwise. Which aerial source did you use?

Hi, you have added `source=digitialglobe` here to the objects, are but your changeset says otherwise. What was the source?

Hiya. How come you're using RapiD for these tasks? I think regular iD would be better. You don't need Facebook's computer vision import data.

By using RapiD you make it harder for the community to monitor the FB data additions, please don't use it if not needed

Careful withy RapiD data! It's data quality isn't great. You've got a track going through a building here.