oh I can't remember now. it was 2 years ago,

I know about needing to split ways (I wrote a post-processing tool to put them back together `osm-lump-ways`) 😉

What do you think about the wiki's description of rapids, compared to your use? Which of you are correct? 🙂🙂

In this changeset, way 1084947854 is tagged as `waterway=rapids`. However is that right? The wiki says a a rapid should be drawn across the river, like weir¹. I noticed this item because it causes the McKenzie River to be split on WaterwayMap.org². The source of this WWM change is this commit c925507³

¹ osm.wiki/Tag:waterway%3Drapids
² https://waterwaymap.org/#map=13.75/44.10959/-122.42299

³ https://github.com/amandasaurus/waterwaymap.org/commit/c9255079842aed73ecc8488b46de91b4d6269a80

Here you added a tiny tiny river, called “Tom's River” <osm.org/way/747887033/history/1>. Is that a real river?

Here, you changed the `name` of a river segment (osm.org/way/358219216) from `Clare River` to `Annagh River`.

However, I'm looking at the OS 1st. Ed. (& 2nd) for Lim. & Tipp., and in all 4 that segment is named “Clare River”. The river segments around that way are also still tagged `name=Clare River` in OSM.

Is this _really_ called Annagh River? If I was mapping this myself, I would have used Clare River for it all. But I won't change it now.

Ich würde es einfach lassen, aber wenn jemand will dieses Fitnesscentre für ein paar Wochen eintrage, habe ich kein Problem

Ich war dort am Samstag. Du hast Recht, es gibt immer noch Schilder und Postkisten für „SO Personal Trainer“. Aber QueerKastle Staff haben mir erzählt, dass dieses Fitnesscentre in dieser Gebäude gibt, aber es zieht am endes des Jahrs aus. Am 01.01. hat QueerKastle das gesamtes Gebäude (Erdgeschloss). d.h. am 01.01. gibt keine „SO Personal Training“ hier.

Hiya! You changed the tag of the tunnel from waterway=channel → =canal.

That means it won't show up on lots of the WaterwayMap.org views as not flowing water. (because canal).

Since it's a tunnel isn't there other things, like pressurised which are better tags?

Thanks. 🙂

@mueschel Thanks for spotting that! I've fixed that in osm.org/changeset/154012665

I had considered making a preset for “logainm based name” stuff, and this sort of simple typo is a reason to do that!

Oops! Every time! 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️

Gods, I need to do a JOSM plugin to stop myself

Hiya! FYI I think you've created a loop in the streams. You can see loops here: <https://waterwaymap.org/loops#map=14.84/53.93014/-7.15049>. In this changeset, you added a few `waterway=stream` and that made a loop. I think it's the northern half of the loop in that link.

I'm not sure what to do. Are you sure all the directions of the ways is correct? Maybe we can figure out if some/one is pointing the wrong way. Are these things `=stream`'s or `=ditch`'s 🤔

Thanks for using my waterwaymap loop detection! You left a little double mapped stream, which caused another loop, and I've removed it here osm.org/changeset/147252471

It's great to see more people keeping an eye on these loops. 👍

osm.org/changeset/147252471

oh sorry! It happened again! sorry

oops. Sorry for large changeset

Sorry! Ah damn it! It happened again! That was my mistake. Sorry.

last time: osm.org/changeset/143218439#map=4/40.25/16.65

Do you know if I can make JOSM stop me from doing that?
https://en.osm.town/deck/@amapanda/111311793968128839

Damn it! Sorry. 😢 I must have forgotten to upload data between data QA fixes.

No, the colours are randomly assigned.

oops, sorry. Fixed

Oops. Sorry. I think I forgot to upload one set of changes before doing the next step. Most of that time I'm good at doing that.

You changed the name:en_GB too. How come?