OpenStreetMap
Relation Wildnistrail deleted by user Lo..., the reason I don't know
Posted by blonder on 24 June 2009 in English.Hello,
tippeltappel told me that the relation Wildnistrail was deleted by user Lo...
The reason I don't know. I do not add this again, because I spent a lot of time doing this work in the past. Lo... can add/complete it again, because he deleted it.
Kind regards,
blonder.
P.S. First read, than work, and always know what you are doing :)
Discussion
Comment from Lipperlandexpress on 24 June 2009 at 21:41
Ask the user why he did this.
If he did a mistake send me the relation ID and I will restore it if no ways are deleted or give me the number of the changeset.
Comment from wieland on 24 June 2009 at 21:56
May there are 2 relations for the same?
Relation Wildnis-Trail (162803)
Relation Wildnis-Trail (70989)
and a third that was deleted?
Comment from blonder on 24 June 2009 at 22:06
The original relation I added was 70989.
Comment from wieland on 25 June 2009 at 11:49
But this is not deleted:
http://osm.cdauth.de/route-manager/relation.php?id=70989
or
osm.org/browse/relation/70989
Comment from blonder on 25 June 2009 at 19:43
In the meantime tippeltappel restored a part of the releation, but
now it contains 11 not connected segments. As I added this relation it was 1 segment.
http://betaplace.emaitie.de/webapps.relation-analyzer/analyze.jsp?relationId=70989