Relation Wildnistrail deleted by user Lo..., the reason I don't know
ایہہ 24؍June 2009ء English وچ «blonder» لیکھ چھپیا گیا سی۔Hello,
tippeltappel told me that the relation Wildnistrail was deleted by user Lo...
The reason I don't know. I do not add this again, because I spent a lot of time doing this work in the past. Lo... can add/complete it again, because he deleted it.
Kind regards,
blonder.
P.S. First read, than work, and always know what you are doing :)
Discussion
ایہہ 24؍June 2009ء 21:41 تے «Lipperlandexpress» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
Ask the user why he did this.
If he did a mistake send me the relation ID and I will restore it if no ways are deleted or give me the number of the changeset.
ایہہ 24؍June 2009ء 21:56 تے «wieland» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
May there are 2 relations for the same?
Relation Wildnis-Trail (162803)
Relation Wildnis-Trail (70989)
and a third that was deleted?
ایہہ 24؍June 2009ء 22:06 تے «blonder» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
The original relation I added was 70989.
ایہہ 25؍June 2009ء 11:49 تے «wieland» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
But this is not deleted:
http://osm.cdauth.de/route-manager/relation.php?id=70989
or
osm.org/browse/relation/70989
ایہہ 25؍June 2009ء 19:43 تے «blonder» ٹپݨی کیتی گئی سی۔
In the meantime tippeltappel restored a part of the releation, but
now it contains 11 not connected segments. As I added this relation it was 1 segment.
http://betaplace.emaitie.de/webapps.relation-analyzer/analyze.jsp?relationId=70989