Relation Wildnistrail deleted by user Lo..., the reason I don't know
blonder 于 2009年六月24日 以 English 发布Hello,
tippeltappel told me that the relation Wildnistrail was deleted by user Lo...
The reason I don't know. I do not add this again, because I spent a lot of time doing this work in the past. Lo... can add/complete it again, because he deleted it.
Kind regards,
blonder.
P.S. First read, than work, and always know what you are doing :)
讨论
Lipperlandexpress 于 2009年06月24日 21:41 的评论
Ask the user why he did this.
If he did a mistake send me the relation ID and I will restore it if no ways are deleted or give me the number of the changeset.
wieland 于 2009年06月24日 21:56 的评论
May there are 2 relations for the same?
Relation Wildnis-Trail (162803)
Relation Wildnis-Trail (70989)
and a third that was deleted?
blonder 于 2009年06月24日 22:06 的评论
The original relation I added was 70989.
wieland 于 2009年06月25日 11:49 的评论
But this is not deleted:
http://osm.cdauth.de/route-manager/relation.php?id=70989
or
osm.org/browse/relation/70989
blonder 于 2009年06月25日 19:43 的评论
In the meantime tippeltappel restored a part of the releation, but
now it contains 11 not connected segments. As I added this relation it was 1 segment.
http://betaplace.emaitie.de/webapps.relation-analyzer/analyze.jsp?relationId=70989