Relation Wildnistrail deleted by user Lo..., the reason I don't know
Zapsal blonder 24. 6. 2009 v jazyce English.Hello,
tippeltappel told me that the relation Wildnistrail was deleted by user Lo...
The reason I don't know. I do not add this again, because I spent a lot of time doing this work in the past. Lo... can add/complete it again, because he deleted it.
Kind regards,
blonder.
P.S. First read, than work, and always know what you are doing :)
Diskuse
Komentář od Lipperlandexpress z 24. 06. 2009 v 21:41
Ask the user why he did this.
If he did a mistake send me the relation ID and I will restore it if no ways are deleted or give me the number of the changeset.
Komentář od wieland z 24. 06. 2009 v 21:56
May there are 2 relations for the same?
Relation Wildnis-Trail (162803)
Relation Wildnis-Trail (70989)
and a third that was deleted?
Komentář od blonder z 24. 06. 2009 v 22:06
The original relation I added was 70989.
Komentář od wieland z 25. 06. 2009 v 11:49
But this is not deleted:
http://osm.cdauth.de/route-manager/relation.php?id=70989
or
osm.org/browse/relation/70989
Komentář od blonder z 25. 06. 2009 v 19:43
In the meantime tippeltappel restored a part of the releation, but
now it contains 11 not connected segments. As I added this relation it was 1 segment.
http://betaplace.emaitie.de/webapps.relation-analyzer/analyze.jsp?relationId=70989