Simbolo d'OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Icôna de mèl Icôna de Bluesky Icôna de Facebook Icôna de LinkedIn Icôna de Mastodon Icôna de Telegram Icôna de X

Discussion

Comentèro de Tom Chance lo 11 May 2009 a 08:54

I'm glad to see someone picking up the St Albans mantle! It would be good to fill in the landuse areas in The Camp area where I started, hint hint ;-)

Comentèro de ianc lo 11 May 2009 a 12:38

I'm pretty much planning on working around the place. New Greens et al has the great advantage being outside my window tho'...

Any idea why Beech Bottom Dyke has stopped displaying on the live map?

Comentèro de Tom Chance lo 11 May 2009 a 14:15

The archaelogical site? It doesn't appear to be in the Mapnik stylesheet:

http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/rendering/mapnik/osm.xml

You could add a request to trac.openstreetmap.org with a suggestion of how it could look. I guess they might also be clamping down on names for areas that don't have a specific style rule, but mention the fact that the name has disappeared in the trac ticket.

Comentèro de ianc lo 11 May 2009 a 15:06

Hmmm. I rather assumed that if it was in a preset and on a pick-list it would be valid...

Comentèro de Tom Chance lo 11 May 2009 a 19:15

Afraid not! All of the various tools are maintained by different people, and the map layers on the OSM front page are treated as sensible default views on a database that contains tonnes of other data. The mapnik stylesheet is maintained by Steve Chilton, who is a pretty experienced cartographer.

Comentèro de ianc lo 12 May 2009 a 15:00

Hmmm. That just seems barking mad to me - hard to imagine a better recipe for confusion.

Sè branchiér por balyér un comentèro