OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

footway vs. track

jknewl द्वारा English में 2 सितंबर 2010 पर पोस्ट किया गया।

Yesterday I added 9 changesets, most ways tagged with what Potlatch comes up with for "public footpaths", highway=footway, foot=yes. I added bicycle=yes and, where (mostly) appropriate, surface=paved. But I wonder if I had better be using highway=track for these 2-3m wide meandering asphalt pathways in parks?

स्थान: Laurelhurst, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, United States
Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

चर्चा

2 सितंबर 2010 को 16:24 पर पर Kevin Steinhardt द्वारा कमेंट

Are cyclists welcome on the path/track?... or is it a case of "there's no ban on cycling"? If cyclists are welcome, I'd suggest highway=cycleway, surface=surfaced (or =tarmac), bicycle=yes, foot=yes, width=[whatever the width is], etc. If cyclists aren't *signed* as welcome, I'd suggest highway=track, surface=surfaced (or =tarmac), bicycle=unknown, foot=yes, width=[whatever].

2 सितंबर 2010 को 16:29 पर पर PhilippeP द्वारा कमेंट

Track is an 'unpaved dirt way' see wiki for a picture ...

3 सितंबर 2010 को 06:37 पर पर richie0815 द्वारा कमेंट

If the way is wide enough and accessible for a vehicle you should use highway=track. Otherwise use path or cycleway or bridleway.

सत्रारंभ यहाँ सत्रारंभ, एक टिप्पणी लिखिने के लिए