ਖੁੱਲ੍ਹਾ-ਗਲੀ-ਨਕਸ਼ਾ ਮਾਰਕਾ OpenStreetMap

footway vs. track

jknewl ਵੱਲੋਂ 2 ਸਤੰਬਰ 2010 ਨੂੰ English ਵਿੱਚ ਜੋੜਿਆ ਗਿਆ।

Yesterday I added 9 changesets, most ways tagged with what Potlatch comes up with for "public footpaths", highway=footway, foot=yes. I added bicycle=yes and, where (mostly) appropriate, surface=paved. But I wonder if I had better be using highway=track for these 2-3m wide meandering asphalt pathways in parks?

ਟਿਕਾਣਾ: Laurelhurst, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, United States
Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ

Kevin Steinhardt ਵੱਲੋਂ 16:24 ਤੇ 2 ਸਤੰਬਰ 2010 'ਤੇ ਟਿੱਪਣੀ

Are cyclists welcome on the path/track?... or is it a case of "there's no ban on cycling"? If cyclists are welcome, I'd suggest highway=cycleway, surface=surfaced (or =tarmac), bicycle=yes, foot=yes, width=[whatever the width is], etc. If cyclists aren't *signed* as welcome, I'd suggest highway=track, surface=surfaced (or =tarmac), bicycle=unknown, foot=yes, width=[whatever].

PhilippeP ਵੱਲੋਂ 16:29 ਤੇ 2 ਸਤੰਬਰ 2010 'ਤੇ ਟਿੱਪਣੀ

Track is an 'unpaved dirt way' see wiki for a picture ...

richie0815 ਵੱਲੋਂ 06:37 ਤੇ 3 ਸਤੰਬਰ 2010 'ਤੇ ਟਿੱਪਣੀ

If the way is wide enough and accessible for a vehicle you should use highway=track. Otherwise use path or cycleway or bridleway.

ਟਿੱਪਣੀ ਛੱਡਣ ਵਾਸਤੇ ਦਾਖ਼ਲ ਹੋਵੋ