@mvexel: Thanks. That’s what I had initially assumed but then I was confused as to why some roads go so far and then have gaps (especially true of the image of Mountain View). I wasn’t contributing to OSM in 2007 so hadn’t realised it started like this. I guess that was the best you could do without satellite imagery until someone actually got there on the ground to check that the roads did link up.
OpenStreetMap
Diskussion
Kommentar fra robert skrevet 26. juli 2014 kl. 10:42
Nice hat martijn.
Kommentar fra mvexel skrevet 26. juli 2014 kl. 22:35
Now available on the interwebs http://mvexel.github.io/thenandnow/#10/52.2644/5.2899
Kommentar fra robert skrevet 26. juli 2014 kl. 22:46
Ok that is very impressive.
Kommentar fra RobJN skrevet 26. juli 2014 kl. 23:37
Nice! Is the 2007 data complete or does it exclude the ODBL non-comliant data?
Kommentar fra mvexel skrevet 27. juli 2014 kl. 00:57
RobJN - this is the data from June 2007 as it was live then, taken from http://planet.osm.org/cc-by-sa/planet-070627.osm.bz2.
Kommentar fra chattiewoman skrevet 27. juli 2014 kl. 14:12
+1 Thanks for sharing.
Kommentar fra Luiyo skrevet 27. juli 2014 kl. 18:44
Wow!
Kommentar fra RobJN skrevet 27. juli 2014 kl. 23:01
@mvexel: Thanks. That’s what I had initially assumed but then I was confused as to why some roads go so far and then have gaps (especially true of the image of Mountain View). I wasn’t contributing to OSM in 2007 so hadn’t realised it started like this. I guess that was the best you could do without satellite imagery until someone actually got there on the ground to check that the roads did link up.
Kommentar fra PatrickCoombe skrevet 28. juli 2014 kl. 04:20
Very very cool, unfortunately my area still looks a lot like “then” but hoping to help change that