@mvexel: Thanks. That’s what I had initially assumed but then I was confused as to why some roads go so far and then have gaps (especially true of the image of Mountain View). I wasn’t contributing to OSM in 2007 so hadn’t realised it started like this. I guess that was the best you could do without satellite imagery until someone actually got there on the ground to check that the roads did link up.
Discussion
نظر از robert در 26 ژوئیه 2014 ساعت 10:42
Nice hat martijn.
نظر از mvexel در 26 ژوئیه 2014 ساعت 22:35
Now available on the interwebs http://mvexel.github.io/thenandnow/#10/52.2644/5.2899
نظر از robert در 26 ژوئیه 2014 ساعت 22:46
Ok that is very impressive.
نظر از RobJN در 26 ژوئیه 2014 ساعت 23:37
Nice! Is the 2007 data complete or does it exclude the ODBL non-comliant data?
نظر از mvexel در 27 ژوئیه 2014 ساعت 00:57
RobJN - this is the data from June 2007 as it was live then, taken from http://planet.osm.org/cc-by-sa/planet-070627.osm.bz2.
نظر از chattiewoman در 27 ژوئیه 2014 ساعت 14:12
+1 Thanks for sharing.
نظر از Luiyo در 27 ژوئیه 2014 ساعت 18:44
Wow!
نظر از RobJN در 27 ژوئیه 2014 ساعت 23:01
@mvexel: Thanks. That’s what I had initially assumed but then I was confused as to why some roads go so far and then have gaps (especially true of the image of Mountain View). I wasn’t contributing to OSM in 2007 so hadn’t realised it started like this. I guess that was the best you could do without satellite imagery until someone actually got there on the ground to check that the roads did link up.
نظر از PatrickCoombe در 28 ژوئیه 2014 ساعت 04:20
Very very cool, unfortunately my area still looks a lot like “then” but hoping to help change that