@mvexel: Thanks. That’s what I had initially assumed but then I was confused as to why some roads go so far and then have gaps (especially true of the image of Mountain View). I wasn’t contributing to OSM in 2007 so hadn’t realised it started like this. I guess that was the best you could do without satellite imagery until someone actually got there on the ground to check that the roads did link up.
OpenStreetMap
Discussion
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ robert ߟߊ߫ 26 July 2014 at 10:42 ߘߐ߫
Nice hat martijn.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ mvexel ߟߊ߫ 26 July 2014 at 22:35 ߘߐ߫
Now available on the interwebs http://mvexel.github.io/thenandnow/#10/52.2644/5.2899
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ robert ߟߊ߫ 26 July 2014 at 22:46 ߘߐ߫
Ok that is very impressive.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ RobJN ߟߊ߫ 26 July 2014 at 23:37 ߘߐ߫
Nice! Is the 2007 data complete or does it exclude the ODBL non-comliant data?
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ mvexel ߟߊ߫ 27 July 2014 at 00:57 ߘߐ߫
RobJN - this is the data from June 2007 as it was live then, taken from http://planet.osm.org/cc-by-sa/planet-070627.osm.bz2.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ chattiewoman ߟߊ߫ 27 July 2014 at 14:12 ߘߐ߫
+1 Thanks for sharing.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ Luiyo ߟߊ߫ 27 July 2014 at 18:44 ߘߐ߫
Wow!
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ RobJN ߟߊ߫ 27 July 2014 at 23:01 ߘߐ߫
@mvexel: Thanks. That’s what I had initially assumed but then I was confused as to why some roads go so far and then have gaps (especially true of the image of Mountain View). I wasn’t contributing to OSM in 2007 so hadn’t realised it started like this. I guess that was the best you could do without satellite imagery until someone actually got there on the ground to check that the roads did link up.
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ PatrickCoombe ߟߊ߫ 28 July 2014 at 04:20 ߘߐ߫
Very very cool, unfortunately my area still looks a lot like “then” but hoping to help change that