,OSM-שלום חנניה וברוך הבא ל
.
!תודה על העידכון של המסלול האדום
.
לא ברורה כל כך דרגת העבירות של הקטע
osm.org/way/315400365
מצד אחד
tracktype=grade2
אומר בישראל שזו דרך עפר לכל כלי רכב. מצד שני
smoothness=horrible
אומר שזו דרך עפר לרכב שטח "רך", שמקביל בערך ל
tracktype=grade2
.
תוכל בבקשה לראות מהן ההגדרות המקובלות בישראל לעבירות בקישור
osm.wiki/WikiProject_Israel#Ways_Belonging_to_a_Trail
?ולהשיב מהי העבירות של קטע זה
.
,שוב תודה על העידכון
זאב

שלום אמיתי,
.
הזזתי את הסימון האדום מבלי למחוק את הדרך שבה הוא עבר לפני השינוי שלך.
.
שוב תודה על תרומתך ל OSM!
.
זאב

,שלום אמיתי וברוך הבא

!תודה על תרומתך לעידכון המפה

האם הדרך שבה עבר השביל האדום עדיין קיימת בשטח או שהסימון האדום הוזז בגלל שהדרך בוטלה
?

Hello Павел Гетманцев,

This is the same edit as in
osm.org/changeset/55217428

You never responded to the comments in that changeset and it was reverted.

This changeset was reverted too.

Please avoid redoing this edit.

You are invited to open a discussion with the local mappers.

The planned nature reserve is also significantly different than mapped.
Removed in changeset 61565466.

The plan for the nature reserve was deposited for public review (הופקדה) in July 2016 - https://www.nevo.co.il/Law_word/law10/yalkut-7309.pdf
There is still a way to go before a Nature Reserve is declared.

The iNature site clearly says it is in its early approcal state:
.
מצב תכנוני:מופקדת
.
As such, it is not a Nature Reserve (yet). In fact, it has not gone to the
מאושרת
status yet.

Hello jakednb,
.
In this changeset you have changed
osm.org/way/183816511/history
from a "medow" area to "protected area".
.
As far as I know, and according to https://www.parks.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/parks2015.pdf ,
this is not a Nature reserve or a National Park.
.
Can you please clarify the source of this change?

Hi Harel,

In this changeset you have created a "wikipedia" tags with "he:..." value and a "wikipedia:he" tag. Both tags point to the same page.

My understanding of the osm.wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_languages
paragraph is that "wikipedia:*" tags should handle additional languages and not include a duplicate of the primary wikipedia language.

If this edit done through Israelhiking.osm.org.il, I'll open an issue on Github. However, I'm not sure what was the user flow required to reproduce it.

If there is no separate bicycle crossing sign (תמרור 812 - https://noeg.co.il/tamrurs/i257.jpg), then IMO highway=footway with footway=crossing tags is just fine, without any bicycle/cycleway tags.
.
When there is such a sign, then some elaborate tagging is required, probably with segregated=yes. I didn't go into the depths of bicycle tagging philosophy.

BTW, according to Israeli law, (129)(ז), riding a bicycle is forbidden on a footway=crossing.
.
The appropriate tagging is therefore,
bicycle=dismount. See
.
https://he.wikisource.org/wiki/%D7%AA%D7%A7%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%94%D7%AA%D7%A2%D7%91%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%94#%D7%A1%D7%A2%D7%99%D7%A3_129

Nevertheless, since I don't want to get into a dispute, and I care a bit less about urban mapping, I have reverted the change for all footway=crossing ways.

The OSM Wiki does not agree on clear differentiation between "path" and "footway" highways as far as access.
.
osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath says:
"or urban paths which a designated for pedestrians only, better use highway=footway."
.
osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway says:
"Where a pathway is designated for pedestrians but is also allowed for bicycles you can use highway=footway and bicycle=yes."
.
It looks like the authors of both "path" and "footway" tags would like to use their own tag for mixed usage with the usual majority for walking.
.
Personally, I find "footway" + bicycle=yes confusing misleading and redundant.
.
In addition, there is nothing that prevents the use of path=crossing or cycleway=crossing. See osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like

Are you referring to highway=crossing or some other kind of crossing?
osm.wiki/Key:crossing

Thanks!
Using "facts on the ground" is an important rule in OSM.

שלום ירון וברוך הבא ל
OSM
.
בעריכה הזו הוספת איסור פניה ימינה מרחוב האילנות לכיכר שבצומת שלו עם הרחובות הדר והמשעול
.
אם אני מבין נכון, איסור פניה זה ההפך את הקטע של רחוב האילנות מהכיכר ועד רחוב הבאר לרחוב חד כיווני.
.
במקרה כזה, התיוג העדיף הוא הוספה של
oneway=yes
על קטעי הרחוב שהם חד כיווניים במקום הוספת איסור פניה בצמתים
.
במידת הצורך, על מנת לדייק בתיוג הקטעים הרלוונטיים, ניתן לפצל רחוב למספר קטעים או להפוך את כיוון הנסיעהבקטע שסומן כחד-כיווני
.
אשמח לעזור במידת הצורך
.
תודה!

Hello Udi,
.
What is the source of this change?

I could not find an announcement of this trail closure at the ITC site -
https://www.teva.org.il/?CategoryID=279&ArticleID=422
or at the RTG site -
https://www.parks.org.il/category/newsflash/
The IRC map says the trail is "Temporarily closed", not "cancelled".

Thanks!

Hello Ans Mansour and welcome to OSM!
.
In this edit you have added an area with no other information - osm.org/way/584382628
.
I have deleted it because it does not seem to match any facts on the ground.
.
I hope you will continue to improve the OSM map, especially in the Arab sector.

Hello,
.
In this edit you have changed the name of the Yasaf stream from Hebrew to Arabic while only the smaller part of the stream is in the area of an Arab village.
.
I understand your eagerness to name OSM items in Arabic. However, when an element is shared between Arab and Jewish areas, please restrict the Arab names to the Arab administrative boundaries.
.
Thank you for your cooperation.