Jarrardis Blogeintrag-Kommentare
Änderungssatz | Zeitpunkt | Kommentar |
---|---|---|
151614849 | vor 7 Monaten | Your source is probably superior; please go ahead and change it. Or put a note on it and someone can go check it out. My information is from the subdivision plat, and plats don't seem to be very reliable for street names in their own subdivisions. Here's a link to the one I used (yes, it's a OneDrive link operated by the city; it's how they do business here apparently): https://middletoncityid-my.sharepoint.com/personal/chambers_middletoncity_org/_layouts/15/onedrive.aspx?id=%2Fpersonal%2Fchambers%5Fmiddletoncity%5Forg%2FDocuments%2F4%2D3%2D2024%20Website%2F3%29%20Waterford%20Final%20Plat&ga=1 |
160702747 | vor 8 Monaten | Thanks tons! I had assumed without thinking that since ID prefers building=construction to construction:building, it would be the same for proposed. But I can see why this isn't the case (a building=proposed doesn't yet exist, but a building=construction does). |
139325085 | vor 8 Monaten | Thanks so much, Allison P! You're amazing, as always! |
136235983 | vor etwa einem Jahr | Thanks so much! I really appreciate that! I enjoy walking, so it's great when I can contribute at the same time! |
142692716 | vor etwa einem Jahr | Ooops! All fixes now! Thanks so much for catching this! You're amazing! |
153436397 | vor etwa einem Jahr | Uh oh. Its this also true for the forest areas downstream? I've got a lot of editing to do, don't I? 😅 |
151607231 | vor etwa einem Jahr | Post-survey update: It is legal to go around (south of) the fenced-off area through the woods, but the terrain is forbidding, there is no path, and the vegitation is difficult. I would not call it feasible, much less a route. |
151614849 | vor etwa einem Jahr | Thanks so much! How do you get them for Ada county? |
151653675 | vor etwa einem Jahr | Ooops! Good catch! Thanks tons! |
151614849 | vor etwa einem Jahr | I usually get them from the Middleton Planning & Zoning or City Council packets: https://middleton.id.gov/Departments/City-Council |
134267884 | vor über einem Jahr | I dunno, I kind of like it. Maybe we should petition the city to make this the correct address? Also: fixed. Thanks tons for catching this! |
148039247 | vor über einem Jahr | Thank you both so much for your advice and help! You're amazing! <3 |
147912344 | vor über einem Jahr | Okay, new rule, I'm not allowed to do house numbers. I have no idea where I got that other number, or why I was so sure of it even while staring at the mailboxes. The number is definitely 321. I went there again today and stayed staring at the numbers for a full minute to see if they'd change. 😅
|
147912344 | vor über einem Jahr | Yes, I thought so too, but when I walked by yesterday, it was clearly written on the mailboxes, and the side of the house up the street. Everything on the north side of Idaho Street has a mailbox in a single clustered location, which may have something to do with it?
|
136235983 | vor über einem Jahr | Planning & Zoning map agrees, so 2041 it is! Thanks again so much for catching this! You're amazing! |
138518761 | vor über einem Jahr | You are absolutely correct. Not sure what happened here, but I removed the house numbered. Thanks so much for catching this! <3 |
138679069 | vor über einem Jahr | Omigosh, thank you so much for catching this! I've corrected it! You're the best! <3 |
135040536 | vor über einem Jahr | The P&Z map shows 915, but yeah, I guess I didn't notice how inconsistent it was. I've put a not so I remember to check it out next time I'm physically in the area. Thanks so much for catching this! |
136235983 | vor über einem Jahr | Good eye! Thanks tons for catching that! I'll go ahead and remove it, so I can fill it back in next time I'm over there (once the weather warms up!) |
142123239 | vor fast 2 Jahren | Correcting my over-zealous tagging right now! Thank you so much for your guidance and dedication! You're the best! |