Jarrardi's Comments
Changeset | Quannu | Cummentu |
---|---|---|
151614849 | 7 misi arrè | Your source is probably superior; please go ahead and change it. Or put a note on it and someone can go check it out. My information is from the subdivision plat, and plats don't seem to be very reliable for street names in their own subdivisions. Here's a link to the one I used (yes, it's a OneDrive link operated by the city; it's how they do business here apparently): https://middletoncityid-my.sharepoint.com/personal/chambers_middletoncity_org/_layouts/15/onedrive.aspx?id=%2Fpersonal%2Fchambers%5Fmiddletoncity%5Forg%2FDocuments%2F4%2D3%2D2024%20Website%2F3%29%20Waterford%20Final%20Plat&ga=1 |
160702747 | 8 misi arrè | Thanks tons! I had assumed without thinking that since ID prefers building=construction to construction:building, it would be the same for proposed. But I can see why this isn't the case (a building=proposed doesn't yet exist, but a building=construction does). |
139325085 | 8 misi arrè | Thanks so much, Allison P! You're amazing, as always! |
136235983 | about 1 year ago | Thanks so much! I really appreciate that! I enjoy walking, so it's great when I can contribute at the same time! |
142692716 | about 1 year ago | Ooops! All fixes now! Thanks so much for catching this! You're amazing! |
153436397 | about 1 year ago | Uh oh. Its this also true for the forest areas downstream? I've got a lot of editing to do, don't I? 😅 |
151607231 | about 1 year ago | Post-survey update: It is legal to go around (south of) the fenced-off area through the woods, but the terrain is forbidding, there is no path, and the vegitation is difficult. I would not call it feasible, much less a route. |
151614849 | about 1 year ago | Thanks so much! How do you get them for Ada county? |
151653675 | about 1 year ago | Ooops! Good catch! Thanks tons! |
151614849 | about 1 year ago | I usually get them from the Middleton Planning & Zoning or City Council packets: https://middleton.id.gov/Departments/City-Council |
134267884 | over 1 year ago | I dunno, I kind of like it. Maybe we should petition the city to make this the correct address? Also: fixed. Thanks tons for catching this! |
148039247 | over 1 year ago | Thank you both so much for your advice and help! You're amazing! <3 |
147912344 | over 1 year ago | Okay, new rule, I'm not allowed to do house numbers. I have no idea where I got that other number, or why I was so sure of it even while staring at the mailboxes. The number is definitely 321. I went there again today and stayed staring at the numbers for a full minute to see if they'd change. 😅
|
147912344 | over 1 year ago | Yes, I thought so too, but when I walked by yesterday, it was clearly written on the mailboxes, and the side of the house up the street. Everything on the north side of Idaho Street has a mailbox in a single clustered location, which may have something to do with it?
|
136235983 | over 1 year ago | Planning & Zoning map agrees, so 2041 it is! Thanks again so much for catching this! You're amazing! |
138518761 | over 1 year ago | You are absolutely correct. Not sure what happened here, but I removed the house numbered. Thanks so much for catching this! <3 |
138679069 | over 1 year ago | Omigosh, thank you so much for catching this! I've corrected it! You're the best! <3 |
135040536 | over 1 year ago | The P&Z map shows 915, but yeah, I guess I didn't notice how inconsistent it was. I've put a not so I remember to check it out next time I'm physically in the area. Thanks so much for catching this! |
136235983 | over 1 year ago | Good eye! Thanks tons for catching that! I'll go ahead and remove it, so I can fill it back in next time I'm over there (once the weather warms up!) |
142123239 | almost 2 years ago | Correcting my over-zealous tagging right now! Thank you so much for your guidance and dedication! You're the best! |