OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
151614849 7 months ago

Your source is probably superior; please go ahead and change it. Or put a note on it and someone can go check it out. My information is from the subdivision plat, and plats don't seem to be very reliable for street names in their own subdivisions. Here's a link to the one I used (yes, it's a OneDrive link operated by the city; it's how they do business here apparently): https://middletoncityid-my.sharepoint.com/personal/chambers_middletoncity_org/_layouts/15/onedrive.aspx?id=%2Fpersonal%2Fchambers%5Fmiddletoncity%5Forg%2FDocuments%2F4%2D3%2D2024%20Website%2F3%29%20Waterford%20Final%20Plat&ga=1

160702747 8 months ago

Thanks tons! I had assumed without thinking that since ID prefers building=construction to construction:building, it would be the same for proposed. But I can see why this isn't the case (a building=proposed doesn't yet exist, but a building=construction does).

139325085 8 months ago

Thanks so much, Allison P! You're amazing, as always!

136235983 about 1 year ago

Thanks so much! I really appreciate that! I enjoy walking, so it's great when I can contribute at the same time!

142692716 about 1 year ago

Ooops! All fixes now! Thanks so much for catching this! You're amazing!

153436397 about 1 year ago

Uh oh. Its this also true for the forest areas downstream? I've got a lot of editing to do, don't I? 😅

151607231 about 1 year ago

Post-survey update: It is legal to go around (south of) the fenced-off area through the woods, but the terrain is forbidding, there is no path, and the vegitation is difficult. I would not call it feasible, much less a route.

151614849 about 1 year ago

Thanks so much! How do you get them for Ada county?

151653675 about 1 year ago

Ooops! Good catch! Thanks tons!

151614849 about 1 year ago

I usually get them from the Middleton Planning & Zoning or City Council packets: https://middleton.id.gov/Departments/City-Council

134267884 over 1 year ago

I dunno, I kind of like it. Maybe we should petition the city to make this the correct address?

Also: fixed. Thanks tons for catching this!

148039247 over 1 year ago

Thank you both so much for your advice and help! You're amazing! <3

147912344 over 1 year ago

Okay, new rule, I'm not allowed to do house numbers. I have no idea where I got that other number, or why I was so sure of it even while staring at the mailboxes. The number is definitely 321. I went there again today and stayed staring at the numbers for a full minute to see if they'd change. 😅
Thanks again so much for your help and patience!

147912344 over 1 year ago

Yes, I thought so too, but when I walked by yesterday, it was clearly written on the mailboxes, and the side of the house up the street. Everything on the north side of Idaho Street has a mailbox in a single clustered location, which may have something to do with it?
I'll inquire further when I can find someone who both lives there and is willing to talk.

136235983 over 1 year ago

Planning & Zoning map agrees, so 2041 it is! Thanks again so much for catching this! You're amazing!

138518761 over 1 year ago

You are absolutely correct. Not sure what happened here, but I removed the house numbered. Thanks so much for catching this! <3

138679069 over 1 year ago

Omigosh, thank you so much for catching this! I've corrected it! You're the best! <3

135040536 over 1 year ago

The P&Z map shows 915, but yeah, I guess I didn't notice how inconsistent it was. I've put a not so I remember to check it out next time I'm physically in the area. Thanks so much for catching this!

136235983 over 1 year ago

Good eye! Thanks tons for catching that! I'll go ahead and remove it, so I can fill it back in next time I'm over there (once the weather warms up!)

142123239 almost 2 years ago

Correcting my over-zealous tagging right now! Thank you so much for your guidance and dedication! You're the best!