Comentários de Jarrardi
Conjunto de alterações | Quando | Comentário |
---|---|---|
151614849 | há 7 meses | Your source is probably superior; please go ahead and change it. Or put a note on it and someone can go check it out. My information is from the subdivision plat, and plats don't seem to be very reliable for street names in their own subdivisions. Here's a link to the one I used (yes, it's a OneDrive link operated by the city; it's how they do business here apparently): https://middletoncityid-my.sharepoint.com/personal/chambers_middletoncity_org/_layouts/15/onedrive.aspx?id=%2Fpersonal%2Fchambers%5Fmiddletoncity%5Forg%2FDocuments%2F4%2D3%2D2024%20Website%2F3%29%20Waterford%20Final%20Plat&ga=1 |
160702747 | há 8 meses | Thanks tons! I had assumed without thinking that since ID prefers building=construction to construction:building, it would be the same for proposed. But I can see why this isn't the case (a building=proposed doesn't yet exist, but a building=construction does). |
139325085 | há 8 meses | Thanks so much, Allison P! You're amazing, as always! |
136235983 | há cerca de 1 ano | Thanks so much! I really appreciate that! I enjoy walking, so it's great when I can contribute at the same time! |
142692716 | há cerca de 1 ano | Ooops! All fixes now! Thanks so much for catching this! You're amazing! |
153436397 | há cerca de 1 ano | Uh oh. Its this also true for the forest areas downstream? I've got a lot of editing to do, don't I? 😅 |
151607231 | há cerca de 1 ano | Post-survey update: It is legal to go around (south of) the fenced-off area through the woods, but the terrain is forbidding, there is no path, and the vegitation is difficult. I would not call it feasible, much less a route. |
151614849 | há cerca de 1 ano | Thanks so much! How do you get them for Ada county? |
151653675 | há cerca de 1 ano | Ooops! Good catch! Thanks tons! |
151614849 | há cerca de 1 ano | I usually get them from the Middleton Planning & Zoning or City Council packets: https://middleton.id.gov/Departments/City-Council |
134267884 | há mais de 1 ano | I dunno, I kind of like it. Maybe we should petition the city to make this the correct address? Also: fixed. Thanks tons for catching this! |
148039247 | há mais de 1 ano | Thank you both so much for your advice and help! You're amazing! <3 |
147912344 | há mais de 1 ano | Okay, new rule, I'm not allowed to do house numbers. I have no idea where I got that other number, or why I was so sure of it even while staring at the mailboxes. The number is definitely 321. I went there again today and stayed staring at the numbers for a full minute to see if they'd change. 😅
|
147912344 | há mais de 1 ano | Yes, I thought so too, but when I walked by yesterday, it was clearly written on the mailboxes, and the side of the house up the street. Everything on the north side of Idaho Street has a mailbox in a single clustered location, which may have something to do with it?
|
136235983 | há mais de 1 ano | Planning & Zoning map agrees, so 2041 it is! Thanks again so much for catching this! You're amazing! |
138518761 | há mais de 1 ano | You are absolutely correct. Not sure what happened here, but I removed the house numbered. Thanks so much for catching this! <3 |
138679069 | há mais de 1 ano | Omigosh, thank you so much for catching this! I've corrected it! You're the best! <3 |
135040536 | há mais de 1 ano | The P&Z map shows 915, but yeah, I guess I didn't notice how inconsistent it was. I've put a not so I remember to check it out next time I'm physically in the area. Thanks so much for catching this! |
136235983 | há mais de 1 ano | Good eye! Thanks tons for catching that! I'll go ahead and remove it, so I can fill it back in next time I'm over there (once the weather warms up!) |
142123239 | há quase 2 anos | Correcting my over-zealous tagging right now! Thank you so much for your guidance and dedication! You're the best! |