Bình luận của Jarrardi
Bộ thay đổi | Lúc đăng | Bình luận |
---|---|---|
151614849 | 7 tháng trước | Your source is probably superior; please go ahead and change it. Or put a note on it and someone can go check it out. My information is from the subdivision plat, and plats don't seem to be very reliable for street names in their own subdivisions. Here's a link to the one I used (yes, it's a OneDrive link operated by the city; it's how they do business here apparently): https://middletoncityid-my.sharepoint.com/personal/chambers_middletoncity_org/_layouts/15/onedrive.aspx?id=%2Fpersonal%2Fchambers%5Fmiddletoncity%5Forg%2FDocuments%2F4%2D3%2D2024%20Website%2F3%29%20Waterford%20Final%20Plat&ga=1 |
160702747 | 8 tháng trước | Thanks tons! I had assumed without thinking that since ID prefers building=construction to construction:building, it would be the same for proposed. But I can see why this isn't the case (a building=proposed doesn't yet exist, but a building=construction does). |
139325085 | 8 tháng trước | Thanks so much, Allison P! You're amazing, as always! |
136235983 | khoảng 1 năm trước | Thanks so much! I really appreciate that! I enjoy walking, so it's great when I can contribute at the same time! |
142692716 | khoảng 1 năm trước | Ooops! All fixes now! Thanks so much for catching this! You're amazing! |
153436397 | khoảng 1 năm trước | Uh oh. Its this also true for the forest areas downstream? I've got a lot of editing to do, don't I? 😅 |
151607231 | khoảng 1 năm trước | Post-survey update: It is legal to go around (south of) the fenced-off area through the woods, but the terrain is forbidding, there is no path, and the vegitation is difficult. I would not call it feasible, much less a route. |
151614849 | khoảng 1 năm trước | Thanks so much! How do you get them for Ada county? |
151653675 | khoảng 1 năm trước | Ooops! Good catch! Thanks tons! |
151614849 | khoảng 1 năm trước | I usually get them from the Middleton Planning & Zoning or City Council packets: https://middleton.id.gov/Departments/City-Council |
134267884 | hơn 1 năm trước | I dunno, I kind of like it. Maybe we should petition the city to make this the correct address? Also: fixed. Thanks tons for catching this! |
148039247 | hơn 1 năm trước | Thank you both so much for your advice and help! You're amazing! <3 |
147912344 | hơn 1 năm trước | Okay, new rule, I'm not allowed to do house numbers. I have no idea where I got that other number, or why I was so sure of it even while staring at the mailboxes. The number is definitely 321. I went there again today and stayed staring at the numbers for a full minute to see if they'd change. 😅
|
147912344 | hơn 1 năm trước | Yes, I thought so too, but when I walked by yesterday, it was clearly written on the mailboxes, and the side of the house up the street. Everything on the north side of Idaho Street has a mailbox in a single clustered location, which may have something to do with it?
|
136235983 | hơn 1 năm trước | Planning & Zoning map agrees, so 2041 it is! Thanks again so much for catching this! You're amazing! |
138518761 | hơn 1 năm trước | You are absolutely correct. Not sure what happened here, but I removed the house numbered. Thanks so much for catching this! <3 |
138679069 | hơn 1 năm trước | Omigosh, thank you so much for catching this! I've corrected it! You're the best! <3 |
135040536 | hơn 1 năm trước | The P&Z map shows 915, but yeah, I guess I didn't notice how inconsistent it was. I've put a not so I remember to check it out next time I'm physically in the area. Thanks so much for catching this! |
136235983 | hơn 1 năm trước | Good eye! Thanks tons for catching that! I'll go ahead and remove it, so I can fill it back in next time I'm over there (once the weather warms up!) |
142123239 | gần 2 năm trước | Correcting my over-zealous tagging right now! Thank you so much for your guidance and dedication! You're the best! |