You requested a review, so here it is. Similar to the last edits, highway=residential isn't good for driveways. Squaring your buildings makes it better.

Thanks for adding opening hours to the shop, that sort of info requires local knowledge!

You asked for a review of this edit, and that all looks fine to me. Watch out for the admin boundaries, we have a lot of little ones in Ireland.

Hi. You added a GAA pitch here ( osm.org/way/342283498 ). But you put sport=soccer. Which can't be right! Is it gaelic football or hurling? If it's both you can put sport=gaelic_games

Hi, you only added an area=yes tag to this building ( osm.org/way/447193538 ). You don't need that tag when it's a closed way, and you do need a tag to say what it is. I've added a building=yes tag to it.

And it's best to make geographically small edits, rather than edit a building in spain and ireland

Hi. You added a building here ( osm.org/way/526849403#map=19/52.61668/-8.33570 ), but you only added the area=yes tag, you need more than that. I've added the building=yes tag to it. Since it's a closed line, you don't need the area=yes tag.

You requested a review. Like previous edits, pretty good. Some similar beginner mistakes, like amenity=parking on a node, highway=residental instead of the highway=service,service=driveway.

Here ( osm.org/way/534977983 ) you mapped it as 2 separate buildings, i.e. 2 ways. I would have mapped that as one building, since it looks like an extension on a house. If they are 2 separate "building" (e.g. like in a semi-d) then you should use 2 OSM ways. Otherwise 1 OSM way is correct.

No problem! That's what the "request a review" feature is for. We all mistakes at the start. (Oh lord, you should see some of the stuff I did at the start!) Keep on mapping!

PS: You can use the S key in iD to make building have right angled corners, which is more accurate.

Hi! You requested a review of this. Similar to your last edits this looks good over all. It's good that you're adding fine details to the car park for Lidl, it's always good to have details! (but low details is better than nothing). Be careful about gluing the carpark to the Lidl building.

You did make 2 mistakes. You shouldn't add an amenity=parking tag to the node at the end of a driveway (like here: osm.org/node/5186745042#map=19/55.08111/-7.68687 ).

And highway=residential shouldn't be used for simple driveways, it's for the roads inside a housing estate or similar. So this road ( osm.org/way/178283019 ) is correct for highway=residential, but this ( osm.org/way/534977962 ) isn't. Instead you should use highway=service service=driveway access=private for simple driveways like that. ( osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway )

Another review! Same as last changeset, pretty good over all, good first start.

You've added 2 buildings ( osm.org/way/534937086 and osm.org/way/534937084 ) which are overlapping, this nearly always a mistake. If they don't touch or overhang each other, the areas shouldn't overlap.

Like before, glueing/connecting the areas of buildings which share a wall(s).

Would you like me to touch up the area a bit so you can see what I'm talking about?

Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review of this edit, so here it is!

It looks pretty good. iD has a way to "make a building more rectangular" by pressing the S key. Most builings in the real world have right angles, so this makes the buildings you add more realistic.

You added a few buildings, and from looking at the aerial imagery, they are all part of a terrace. The OSM convention is to connect/"glue" all those areas together, since the buildings share a wall.

You added a footpath ( osm.org/way/534878943 ), but you don't need to connect the path to the building. If you add an entrance to the building, then you can connect them there.

You added 2 car parks on the left as 2 different areas, Are they really separate? In OSM we add one OSM object for one thing. If you have 2 car parks beside each other who are owned by different people, then add 2 areas. If they are the same car park, then merge them into one area.

Otherwise, pretty good! Keep up the mapping. :)

You asked for a review, so here it is. This looks great! I'm not local to Tralee, so I can't check it's there, but I trust you. It's great that you added lots of details, like phone number, postcode, and address data. Keep it up!

One note: The "operator" tag shouldn't be put here, that's only for things like ATMs ("The operator of this ATM is [BANK]", some countries charge a fee for using an ATM outside your bank), or for things like bus routes ("The 45A is operated by Dublin Bus"). You don't need to put someone's personal details here.

You asked for a review of this, so here it is. You've put name=Main St., when the street should be expanded, but you fixed that later. So all good. 👍

You asked for a review of this, but this looks good. tourism tag is better than the bodgy amentiy

Hi @DLOK, it's always good to get feedback from what people were were advised. Yes the OSM database is used for many things, rendering the map, and making routing/navigation. Some of the things you added here can break that, which is what Nakaner is referring to. It's probably good to ensure that, in future, you be aware of routing and ensure your improvements are improvements from all perspectives. 🙂

Hello! And welcome to OSM! I'm rorym, one of the active OSMers from Ireland, and I see you requested a review of this change, so here we go!

Overall it's very good. 👍 You've added houses that were missing, and included details that we can't get from aerial imagery, like addresses. Addresses are hard to timeconsuming to collect, but very useful, so it's great that you're adding them to OSM!

There's a few newbie issues, which are kinda understandable. iD has a "make an area rightangular" (I think by pressing S), and that can make your buildings nicer and more accurate. They have right angled corners in the real world, so might as well map them correctly in OSM.

There's a few times (like here osm.org/way/533371044#map=19/53.46579/-6.22973 ) where you should "glue" the buildings together. They share a wall, so we show that in OSM by making the areas share 2 points. I'm pretty sure most of those are semi-d's, so there should be 2 buildings there, you can split them down the middle.

Hope that wasn't too detailed! Don't worry too much about the complicated things I've mentioned, you're doing fine as it is. 🙂

You requested a review, so here it is! Similar to other edits this is perfectly fine and correct.

Using a building=barn here (it looks like a barn) makes the map better than just building=yes. There are a few other buildings around which you didn't map. While you're in an area, why not just map a few more.

Hi! welcome to OSM! This townland is already mapped here ( osm.org/relation/5646669 ), so I've removed the area you added (this one osm.org/way/518659728 ), in this changeset ( osm.org/changeset/53006146 ).

I'll explain more about townlands & OSM in a private message.

Hi! Review requested, so here we go. You've improved the barn as per last feedback! so yay! All good.

You requested a review of this. Similar to last time ( osm.org/changeset/52972340 ), this is a perfectly fine edit. 🙂 Welcome to OSM, and keep up the good work! 👍

Likewise, if you used a more specific building value, that would be better. This looks like a house, so "building=house" is more accurate.

And again, there is what looks like a barn to the bottom right which you could map as well.