OpenStreetMap
In my experience, the project of the week for adding tennis courts brought in a lot of tennis courts and a lot of maplint. The leisure=pitch tag is missing from a surprising number of them. Perhaps this convention wasn't well explained by the project, perhaps the hierarchy is too confusing. Does a sports_centre have a recreation_ground with pitches?
Do you see similar results in your area?
Фекер алышыу
42429тарафынан17 August 2011 cәғәт 09:57көндө ҡаралған
leisure=pitch is not well-known English.
leisure=field would be better.
smsm1тарафынан17 August 2011 cәғәт 11:16көндө ҡаралған
leisure=pitch is something specifically designed and maintained for sport. On the other hand leisure=field is usually left to nature to be overgrown and usually isn't maintained for a specific sport.
Mappoтарафынан17 August 2011 cәғәт 11:46көндө ҡаралған
leisure=pitch seems reasonable english to me. Could it be a UK/US english thing. Don't they call pitches, fields in the US e.g football pitch vs soccer field?
On the other hand, I've never heard anyone say Tennis Pitch or Tennis Field, only Tennis Court, which may explain why people are less likely to use a tag that seems wrong.
maxolasersquadтарафынан17 August 2011 cәғәт 12:06көндө ҡаралған
I've never heard the word "pitch", here in the US, to mean anything more than to toss something at someone, like pitching a ball, or a sales pitch. I've never heard of a basketball court, or even a baseball field, for that matter, referred to as a pitch. I find the leisure=pitch un-intuitive as well.
z-dudeтарафынан18 August 2011 cәғәт 06:27көндө ҡаралған
I think 'pitch' is an English word, not a US word.
nmixterтарафынан20 August 2011 cәғәт 23:03көндө ҡаралған
They use it in the us for soccer, uh futball fields but that is it