OpenStreetMap 開放街圖
In my experience, the project of the week for adding tennis courts brought in a lot of tennis courts and a lot of maplint. The leisure=pitch tag is missing from a surprising number of them. Perhaps this convention wasn't well explained by the project, perhaps the hierarchy is too confusing. Does a sports_centre have a recreation_ground with pitches?
Do you see similar results in your area?
討論
由 42429 於 2011年08月17日 09時57分 發表的評論
leisure=pitch is not well-known English.
leisure=field would be better.
由 smsm1 於 2011年08月17日 11時16分 發表的評論
leisure=pitch is something specifically designed and maintained for sport. On the other hand leisure=field is usually left to nature to be overgrown and usually isn't maintained for a specific sport.
由 Mappo 於 2011年08月17日 11時46分 發表的評論
leisure=pitch seems reasonable english to me. Could it be a UK/US english thing. Don't they call pitches, fields in the US e.g football pitch vs soccer field?
On the other hand, I've never heard anyone say Tennis Pitch or Tennis Field, only Tennis Court, which may explain why people are less likely to use a tag that seems wrong.
由 maxolasersquad 於 2011年08月17日 12時06分 發表的評論
I've never heard the word "pitch", here in the US, to mean anything more than to toss something at someone, like pitching a ball, or a sales pitch. I've never heard of a basketball court, or even a baseball field, for that matter, referred to as a pitch. I find the leisure=pitch un-intuitive as well.
由 z-dude 於 2011年08月18日 06時27分 發表的評論
I think 'pitch' is an English word, not a US word.
由 nmixter 於 2011年08月20日 23時03分 發表的評論
They use it in the us for soccer, uh futball fields but that is it