jremillards Blogeintrag-Kommentare
Änderungssatz | Zeitpunkt | Kommentar |
---|---|---|
52641316 | vor über 7 Jahren | The node added on this changeset, needs other tags to say what it is. Just a name and description, nothing can really use that data. |
56595182 | vor über 7 Jahren | I got it! |
56595182 | vor über 7 Jahren | Hi! Check out the map. This change set merged the pond and conservation property into a one relation. This is a super tricky area to map, I think it requires sharing the same "way" across several relations to handle the islands. JOSM might be required. |
53323698 | vor über 7 Jahren | This looks like a change for Pokemon. I am reverting them. Felony, please only map real parks and waterways. |
50535922 | vor über 7 Jahren | Hi! I Way 509977764 is not mapped correctly. The sports=baseball tag should be on the entire baseball field, not just the infield. If you want to map the infields you should use a different tag. |
46996172 | vor über 7 Jahren | Hi!, Is way 83195084 correct? None of the sat images don't show any baseball fields. |
33685066 | vor fast 9 Jahren | Could you look at this changeset. osm.org/changeset/41456917
|
34738606 | vor etwa 9 Jahren | The change set comment is perfect. Thanks for making this update! |
35698586 | vor über 9 Jahren | Also, I guess it would make sense to remove the landuse=forest from the relation.... |
35698586 | vor über 9 Jahren | The Wachusett Mountain State Reservation includes the ski area. Changing the boundary of the reservation around the ski slopes renders nice but it is not tagged correctly. The reservation boundary should match the MassGIS parcel, the ski slopes should be a new ways with something like natural=grassland, or landuse=meadow, etc. |
22153054 | vor etwa 10 Jahren | admin_level=4 on osm.org/relation/187118 ? State parts are not administrative boundaries? |
30735592 | vor über 10 Jahren | Hi, Is this a public trail. Is on private property? Should it be access=private? |
22987292 | vor über 10 Jahren | Hi Shawn, I was looking over the Barnstable County relation osm.org/relation/2294308. This node is present in addition to a "label" node. I think only one of them should exist, unless this node is some kind of Barnstable County administration building? |
23113082 | vor über 10 Jahren | Why did you change all of the piste:type=downhill to piste:type=yes? I think piste:type=downhill is a valid tag? |
19902570 | vor über 10 Jahren | Hi, ski trails should be connected like roads for roating. I fixed a bunch of them at Attitash Mountain. Just FYI, in case you are working on other ski areas. |
29059403 | vor über 10 Jahren | Hi! I changed some tags used on this changeset. When you are mapping cross country ski areas, you should use piste:type=nordic. surface snow is not valid unless it is covered in snow all year long. If some of the trails are only cross country ski paths, they should not get the foot=yes, highway=footway tags. Lastly, I put them into a site relation so they will get rendered in opensnowmap.org. osm.wiki/Piste_Maps
|
29193535 | vor über 10 Jahren | The tagging includes all of the source files attributes and there are duplicates. Please revert the changeset, and follow the import process. The tagging issues and duplicate points can easily be addressed with a bit more more up front preparation time. |
29038115 | vor über 10 Jahren | Please following the import process. osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
|
28224236 | vor über 10 Jahren | Please stop changing the tagging on Fitch's bridge. The old rr bridge was torn down last year, it was tagged correctly. |
26510923 | vor fast 11 Jahren | Testing changeset comment feature. |