jremillard's hozzászólásai
Módosításcsomag | Mikor | Hozzászólás |
---|---|---|
52641316 | több mint 7 évvel ezelőtt | The node added on this changeset, needs other tags to say what it is. Just a name and description, nothing can really use that data. |
56595182 | több mint 7 évvel ezelőtt | I got it! |
56595182 | több mint 7 évvel ezelőtt | Hi! Check out the map. This change set merged the pond and conservation property into a one relation. This is a super tricky area to map, I think it requires sharing the same "way" across several relations to handle the islands. JOSM might be required. |
53323698 | több mint 7 évvel ezelőtt | This looks like a change for Pokemon. I am reverting them. Felony, please only map real parks and waterways. |
50535922 | több mint 7 évvel ezelőtt | Hi! I Way 509977764 is not mapped correctly. The sports=baseball tag should be on the entire baseball field, not just the infield. If you want to map the infields you should use a different tag. |
46996172 | több mint 7 évvel ezelőtt | Hi!, Is way 83195084 correct? None of the sat images don't show any baseball fields. |
33685066 | majdnem 9 évvel ezelőtt | Could you look at this changeset. osm.org/changeset/41456917
|
34738606 | nagyjából 9 évvel ezelőtt | The change set comment is perfect. Thanks for making this update! |
35698586 | több mint 9 évvel ezelőtt | Also, I guess it would make sense to remove the landuse=forest from the relation.... |
35698586 | több mint 9 évvel ezelőtt | The Wachusett Mountain State Reservation includes the ski area. Changing the boundary of the reservation around the ski slopes renders nice but it is not tagged correctly. The reservation boundary should match the MassGIS parcel, the ski slopes should be a new ways with something like natural=grassland, or landuse=meadow, etc. |
22153054 | nagyjából 10 évvel ezelőtt | admin_level=4 on osm.org/relation/187118 ? State parts are not administrative boundaries? |
30735592 | több mint 10 évvel ezelőtt | Hi, Is this a public trail. Is on private property? Should it be access=private? |
22987292 | több mint 10 évvel ezelőtt | Hi Shawn, I was looking over the Barnstable County relation osm.org/relation/2294308. This node is present in addition to a "label" node. I think only one of them should exist, unless this node is some kind of Barnstable County administration building? |
23113082 | több mint 10 évvel ezelőtt | Why did you change all of the piste:type=downhill to piste:type=yes? I think piste:type=downhill is a valid tag? |
19902570 | több mint 10 évvel ezelőtt | Hi, ski trails should be connected like roads for roating. I fixed a bunch of them at Attitash Mountain. Just FYI, in case you are working on other ski areas. |
29059403 | több mint 10 évvel ezelőtt | Hi! I changed some tags used on this changeset. When you are mapping cross country ski areas, you should use piste:type=nordic. surface snow is not valid unless it is covered in snow all year long. If some of the trails are only cross country ski paths, they should not get the foot=yes, highway=footway tags. Lastly, I put them into a site relation so they will get rendered in opensnowmap.org. osm.wiki/Piste_Maps
|
29193535 | több mint 10 évvel ezelőtt | The tagging includes all of the source files attributes and there are duplicates. Please revert the changeset, and follow the import process. The tagging issues and duplicate points can easily be addressed with a bit more more up front preparation time. |
29038115 | több mint 10 évvel ezelőtt | Please following the import process. osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
|
28224236 | több mint 10 évvel ezelőtt | Please stop changing the tagging on Fitch's bridge. The old rr bridge was torn down last year, it was tagged correctly. |
26510923 | majdnem 11 évvel ezelőtt | Testing changeset comment feature. |