Opmerkingen van jremillard
Wijzigingenset | Wanneer | Reactie |
---|---|---|
52641316 | meer dan 7 jaar geleden | The node added on this changeset, needs other tags to say what it is. Just a name and description, nothing can really use that data. |
56595182 | meer dan 7 jaar geleden | I got it! |
56595182 | meer dan 7 jaar geleden | Hi! Check out the map. This change set merged the pond and conservation property into a one relation. This is a super tricky area to map, I think it requires sharing the same "way" across several relations to handle the islands. JOSM might be required. |
53323698 | meer dan 7 jaar geleden | This looks like a change for Pokemon. I am reverting them. Felony, please only map real parks and waterways. |
50535922 | meer dan 7 jaar geleden | Hi! I Way 509977764 is not mapped correctly. The sports=baseball tag should be on the entire baseball field, not just the infield. If you want to map the infields you should use a different tag. |
46996172 | meer dan 7 jaar geleden | Hi!, Is way 83195084 correct? None of the sat images don't show any baseball fields. |
33685066 | bijna 9 jaar geleden | Could you look at this changeset. osm.org/changeset/41456917
|
34738606 | ongeveer 9 jaar geleden | The change set comment is perfect. Thanks for making this update! |
35698586 | meer dan 9 jaar geleden | Also, I guess it would make sense to remove the landuse=forest from the relation.... |
35698586 | meer dan 9 jaar geleden | The Wachusett Mountain State Reservation includes the ski area. Changing the boundary of the reservation around the ski slopes renders nice but it is not tagged correctly. The reservation boundary should match the MassGIS parcel, the ski slopes should be a new ways with something like natural=grassland, or landuse=meadow, etc. |
22153054 | ongeveer 10 jaar geleden | admin_level=4 on osm.org/relation/187118 ? State parts are not administrative boundaries? |
30735592 | meer dan 10 jaar geleden | Hi, Is this a public trail. Is on private property? Should it be access=private? |
22987292 | meer dan 10 jaar geleden | Hi Shawn, I was looking over the Barnstable County relation osm.org/relation/2294308. This node is present in addition to a "label" node. I think only one of them should exist, unless this node is some kind of Barnstable County administration building? |
23113082 | meer dan 10 jaar geleden | Why did you change all of the piste:type=downhill to piste:type=yes? I think piste:type=downhill is a valid tag? |
19902570 | meer dan 10 jaar geleden | Hi, ski trails should be connected like roads for roating. I fixed a bunch of them at Attitash Mountain. Just FYI, in case you are working on other ski areas. |
29059403 | meer dan 10 jaar geleden | Hi! I changed some tags used on this changeset. When you are mapping cross country ski areas, you should use piste:type=nordic. surface snow is not valid unless it is covered in snow all year long. If some of the trails are only cross country ski paths, they should not get the foot=yes, highway=footway tags. Lastly, I put them into a site relation so they will get rendered in opensnowmap.org. osm.wiki/Piste_Maps
|
29193535 | meer dan 10 jaar geleden | The tagging includes all of the source files attributes and there are duplicates. Please revert the changeset, and follow the import process. The tagging issues and duplicate points can easily be addressed with a bit more more up front preparation time. |
29038115 | meer dan 10 jaar geleden | Please following the import process. osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
|
28224236 | meer dan 10 jaar geleden | Please stop changing the tagging on Fitch's bridge. The old rr bridge was torn down last year, it was tagged correctly. |
26510923 | bijna 11 jaar geleden | Testing changeset comment feature. |