Comentariile jremillard
Set de modificări | Când | Comentariu |
---|---|---|
52641316 | mai mult de 7 ani în urmă | The node added on this changeset, needs other tags to say what it is. Just a name and description, nothing can really use that data. |
56595182 | mai mult de 7 ani în urmă | I got it! |
56595182 | mai mult de 7 ani în urmă | Hi! Check out the map. This change set merged the pond and conservation property into a one relation. This is a super tricky area to map, I think it requires sharing the same "way" across several relations to handle the islands. JOSM might be required. |
53323698 | mai mult de 7 ani în urmă | This looks like a change for Pokemon. I am reverting them. Felony, please only map real parks and waterways. |
50535922 | mai mult de 7 ani în urmă | Hi! I Way 509977764 is not mapped correctly. The sports=baseball tag should be on the entire baseball field, not just the infield. If you want to map the infields you should use a different tag. |
46996172 | mai mult de 7 ani în urmă | Hi!, Is way 83195084 correct? None of the sat images don't show any baseball fields. |
33685066 | aproape 9 ani în urmă | Could you look at this changeset. osm.org/changeset/41456917
|
34738606 | aproximativ 9 ani în urmă | The change set comment is perfect. Thanks for making this update! |
35698586 | mai mult de 9 ani în urmă | Also, I guess it would make sense to remove the landuse=forest from the relation.... |
35698586 | mai mult de 9 ani în urmă | The Wachusett Mountain State Reservation includes the ski area. Changing the boundary of the reservation around the ski slopes renders nice but it is not tagged correctly. The reservation boundary should match the MassGIS parcel, the ski slopes should be a new ways with something like natural=grassland, or landuse=meadow, etc. |
22153054 | aproximativ 10 ani în urmă | admin_level=4 on osm.org/relation/187118 ? State parts are not administrative boundaries? |
30735592 | mai mult de 10 ani în urmă | Hi, Is this a public trail. Is on private property? Should it be access=private? |
22987292 | mai mult de 10 ani în urmă | Hi Shawn, I was looking over the Barnstable County relation osm.org/relation/2294308. This node is present in addition to a "label" node. I think only one of them should exist, unless this node is some kind of Barnstable County administration building? |
23113082 | mai mult de 10 ani în urmă | Why did you change all of the piste:type=downhill to piste:type=yes? I think piste:type=downhill is a valid tag? |
19902570 | mai mult de 10 ani în urmă | Hi, ski trails should be connected like roads for roating. I fixed a bunch of them at Attitash Mountain. Just FYI, in case you are working on other ski areas. |
29059403 | mai mult de 10 ani în urmă | Hi! I changed some tags used on this changeset. When you are mapping cross country ski areas, you should use piste:type=nordic. surface snow is not valid unless it is covered in snow all year long. If some of the trails are only cross country ski paths, they should not get the foot=yes, highway=footway tags. Lastly, I put them into a site relation so they will get rendered in opensnowmap.org. osm.wiki/Piste_Maps
|
29193535 | mai mult de 10 ani în urmă | The tagging includes all of the source files attributes and there are duplicates. Please revert the changeset, and follow the import process. The tagging issues and duplicate points can easily be addressed with a bit more more up front preparation time. |
29038115 | mai mult de 10 ani în urmă | Please following the import process. osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
|
28224236 | mai mult de 10 ani în urmă | Please stop changing the tagging on Fitch's bridge. The old rr bridge was torn down last year, it was tagged correctly. |
26510923 | aproape 11 ani în urmă | Testing changeset comment feature. |