Comentarios de jremillard
Conxunto de modificacións | Cando | Comentario |
---|---|---|
52641316 | hai máis de 7 anos | The node added on this changeset, needs other tags to say what it is. Just a name and description, nothing can really use that data. |
56595182 | hai máis de 7 anos | I got it! |
56595182 | hai máis de 7 anos | Hi! Check out the map. This change set merged the pond and conservation property into a one relation. This is a super tricky area to map, I think it requires sharing the same "way" across several relations to handle the islands. JOSM might be required. |
53323698 | hai máis de 7 anos | This looks like a change for Pokemon. I am reverting them. Felony, please only map real parks and waterways. |
50535922 | hai máis de 7 anos | Hi! I Way 509977764 is not mapped correctly. The sports=baseball tag should be on the entire baseball field, not just the infield. If you want to map the infields you should use a different tag. |
46996172 | hai máis de 7 anos | Hi!, Is way 83195084 correct? None of the sat images don't show any baseball fields. |
33685066 | hai case 9 anos | Could you look at this changeset. osm.org/changeset/41456917
|
34738606 | hai ó redor de 9 anos | The change set comment is perfect. Thanks for making this update! |
35698586 | hai máis de 9 anos | Also, I guess it would make sense to remove the landuse=forest from the relation.... |
35698586 | hai máis de 9 anos | The Wachusett Mountain State Reservation includes the ski area. Changing the boundary of the reservation around the ski slopes renders nice but it is not tagged correctly. The reservation boundary should match the MassGIS parcel, the ski slopes should be a new ways with something like natural=grassland, or landuse=meadow, etc. |
22153054 | hai ó redor de 10 anos | admin_level=4 on osm.org/relation/187118 ? State parts are not administrative boundaries? |
30735592 | hai máis de 10 anos | Hi, Is this a public trail. Is on private property? Should it be access=private? |
22987292 | hai máis de 10 anos | Hi Shawn, I was looking over the Barnstable County relation osm.org/relation/2294308. This node is present in addition to a "label" node. I think only one of them should exist, unless this node is some kind of Barnstable County administration building? |
23113082 | hai máis de 10 anos | Why did you change all of the piste:type=downhill to piste:type=yes? I think piste:type=downhill is a valid tag? |
19902570 | hai máis de 10 anos | Hi, ski trails should be connected like roads for roating. I fixed a bunch of them at Attitash Mountain. Just FYI, in case you are working on other ski areas. |
29059403 | hai máis de 10 anos | Hi! I changed some tags used on this changeset. When you are mapping cross country ski areas, you should use piste:type=nordic. surface snow is not valid unless it is covered in snow all year long. If some of the trails are only cross country ski paths, they should not get the foot=yes, highway=footway tags. Lastly, I put them into a site relation so they will get rendered in opensnowmap.org. osm.wiki/Piste_Maps
|
29193535 | hai máis de 10 anos | The tagging includes all of the source files attributes and there are duplicates. Please revert the changeset, and follow the import process. The tagging issues and duplicate points can easily be addressed with a bit more more up front preparation time. |
29038115 | hai máis de 10 anos | Please following the import process. osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
|
28224236 | hai máis de 10 anos | Please stop changing the tagging on Fitch's bridge. The old rr bridge was torn down last year, it was tagged correctly. |
26510923 | hai case 11 anos | Testing changeset comment feature. |