jremillard 的评论
变更集 | 时间 | 评论 |
---|---|---|
52641316 | 超过7年前 | The node added on this changeset, needs other tags to say what it is. Just a name and description, nothing can really use that data. |
56595182 | 超过7年前 | I got it! |
56595182 | 超过7年前 | Hi! Check out the map. This change set merged the pond and conservation property into a one relation. This is a super tricky area to map, I think it requires sharing the same "way" across several relations to handle the islands. JOSM might be required. |
53323698 | 超过7年前 | This looks like a change for Pokemon. I am reverting them. Felony, please only map real parks and waterways. |
50535922 | 超过7年前 | Hi! I Way 509977764 is not mapped correctly. The sports=baseball tag should be on the entire baseball field, not just the infield. If you want to map the infields you should use a different tag. |
46996172 | 超过7年前 | Hi!, Is way 83195084 correct? None of the sat images don't show any baseball fields. |
33685066 | 近9年前 | Could you look at this changeset. osm.org/changeset/41456917
|
34738606 | 约9年前 | The change set comment is perfect. Thanks for making this update! |
35698586 | 超过9年前 | Also, I guess it would make sense to remove the landuse=forest from the relation.... |
35698586 | 超过9年前 | The Wachusett Mountain State Reservation includes the ski area. Changing the boundary of the reservation around the ski slopes renders nice but it is not tagged correctly. The reservation boundary should match the MassGIS parcel, the ski slopes should be a new ways with something like natural=grassland, or landuse=meadow, etc. |
22153054 | 约10年前 | admin_level=4 on osm.org/relation/187118 ? State parts are not administrative boundaries? |
30735592 | 超过10年前 | Hi, Is this a public trail. Is on private property? Should it be access=private? |
22987292 | 超过10年前 | Hi Shawn, I was looking over the Barnstable County relation osm.org/relation/2294308. This node is present in addition to a "label" node. I think only one of them should exist, unless this node is some kind of Barnstable County administration building? |
23113082 | 超过10年前 | Why did you change all of the piste:type=downhill to piste:type=yes? I think piste:type=downhill is a valid tag? |
19902570 | 超过10年前 | Hi, ski trails should be connected like roads for roating. I fixed a bunch of them at Attitash Mountain. Just FYI, in case you are working on other ski areas. |
29059403 | 超过10年前 | Hi! I changed some tags used on this changeset. When you are mapping cross country ski areas, you should use piste:type=nordic. surface snow is not valid unless it is covered in snow all year long. If some of the trails are only cross country ski paths, they should not get the foot=yes, highway=footway tags. Lastly, I put them into a site relation so they will get rendered in opensnowmap.org. osm.wiki/Piste_Maps
|
29193535 | 超过10年前 | The tagging includes all of the source files attributes and there are duplicates. Please revert the changeset, and follow the import process. The tagging issues and duplicate points can easily be addressed with a bit more more up front preparation time. |
29038115 | 超过10年前 | Please following the import process. osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
|
28224236 | 超过10年前 | Please stop changing the tagging on Fitch's bridge. The old rr bridge was torn down last year, it was tagged correctly. |
26510923 | 近11年前 | Testing changeset comment feature. |