Athugasemdir frá jremillard
Breytingasett | Þegar | Athugasemd |
---|---|---|
52641316 | fyrir meira en 7 árum síðan | The node added on this changeset, needs other tags to say what it is. Just a name and description, nothing can really use that data. |
56595182 | fyrir meira en 7 árum síðan | I got it! |
56595182 | fyrir meira en 7 árum síðan | Hi! Check out the map. This change set merged the pond and conservation property into a one relation. This is a super tricky area to map, I think it requires sharing the same "way" across several relations to handle the islands. JOSM might be required. |
53323698 | fyrir meira en 7 árum síðan | This looks like a change for Pokemon. I am reverting them. Felony, please only map real parks and waterways. |
50535922 | fyrir meira en 7 árum síðan | Hi! I Way 509977764 is not mapped correctly. The sports=baseball tag should be on the entire baseball field, not just the infield. If you want to map the infields you should use a different tag. |
46996172 | fyrir meira en 7 árum síðan | Hi!, Is way 83195084 correct? None of the sat images don't show any baseball fields. |
33685066 | fyrir næstum 9 árum síðan | Could you look at this changeset. osm.org/changeset/41456917
|
34738606 | fyrir um 9 árum síðan | The change set comment is perfect. Thanks for making this update! |
35698586 | fyrir meira en 9 árum síðan | Also, I guess it would make sense to remove the landuse=forest from the relation.... |
35698586 | fyrir meira en 9 árum síðan | The Wachusett Mountain State Reservation includes the ski area. Changing the boundary of the reservation around the ski slopes renders nice but it is not tagged correctly. The reservation boundary should match the MassGIS parcel, the ski slopes should be a new ways with something like natural=grassland, or landuse=meadow, etc. |
22153054 | fyrir um 10 árum síðan | admin_level=4 on osm.org/relation/187118 ? State parts are not administrative boundaries? |
30735592 | fyrir meira en 10 árum síðan | Hi, Is this a public trail. Is on private property? Should it be access=private? |
22987292 | fyrir meira en 10 árum síðan | Hi Shawn, I was looking over the Barnstable County relation osm.org/relation/2294308. This node is present in addition to a "label" node. I think only one of them should exist, unless this node is some kind of Barnstable County administration building? |
23113082 | fyrir meira en 10 árum síðan | Why did you change all of the piste:type=downhill to piste:type=yes? I think piste:type=downhill is a valid tag? |
19902570 | fyrir meira en 10 árum síðan | Hi, ski trails should be connected like roads for roating. I fixed a bunch of them at Attitash Mountain. Just FYI, in case you are working on other ski areas. |
29059403 | fyrir meira en 10 árum síðan | Hi! I changed some tags used on this changeset. When you are mapping cross country ski areas, you should use piste:type=nordic. surface snow is not valid unless it is covered in snow all year long. If some of the trails are only cross country ski paths, they should not get the foot=yes, highway=footway tags. Lastly, I put them into a site relation so they will get rendered in opensnowmap.org. osm.wiki/Piste_Maps
|
29193535 | fyrir meira en 10 árum síðan | The tagging includes all of the source files attributes and there are duplicates. Please revert the changeset, and follow the import process. The tagging issues and duplicate points can easily be addressed with a bit more more up front preparation time. |
29038115 | fyrir meira en 10 árum síðan | Please following the import process. osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
|
28224236 | fyrir meira en 10 árum síðan | Please stop changing the tagging on Fitch's bridge. The old rr bridge was torn down last year, it was tagged correctly. |
26510923 | fyrir næstum 11 árum síðan | Testing changeset comment feature. |