Logo de OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap

Gruppo de modificationes Quando Commento
72621105 circa 5 annos retro

Bonjour Charles,
Oui, je pense que c'est le cas.
Toutefois, les travaux et amemagements sont peut etre encore differents, 1 an apres.
Et je ne peux plus verifier sur place. Pas d'imagerie recente et haute qualite non plus...

83100456 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83100456

83100251 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83100251

83098158 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83098158

83089420 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83089420

83089249 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83089249

83068513 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83068513

83066113 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83066113

83062835 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83062835

83046344 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83046344

83045091 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83045091

83044801 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83044801

83044373 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83044373

83043663 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83043663

83014348 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83014348

82999645 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82999645

82999361 plus de 5 annos retro

warning: third-party data with unclear ownership and dubious license status
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82999361

72875293 quasi 6 annos retro

> je suis revenu sur la version précédente de osm.org/way/210550884/history
Il y a une séparation physique entre la voie principale et la piste cyclable, donc ce n'est pas une bande.

Ah tiens, c'est étrange, je n'ai pas vu de séparation physique, mais je n'ai pas fait toute la longueur de l'avenue, d'où mon ajout de commentaire en fixme.

72875293 quasi 6 annos retro

Bonjour StephaneP

Vus la configuration et mes souvenirs, l'infrastructure à droite est la voie parallèle séparée, tandis que l'infrastructure à gauche est le cycleway:left.
Donc oui, il semble correct de supprimer busway=lane + cycleway=share_busway et de conserver busway:left=opposite_lane + cycleway:left=share_busway

72433228 circa 6 annos retro

En fait, sur place, à l'accès nord de la rue Louis Delgrès, les panneaux et panonceaux sont tellement tagués qu'il est impossible de comprendre les restrictions d'accès.
On va dire que ce n'est pas critique, puisque peu de chance qu'un itinéraire cyclable soit favorisé par ces segments.