I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
OpenStreetMap
Kaozeadenn
Evezhiadenn a-berzh Vincent de Phily d'an 19 May 2020 da 11:39
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
Evezhiadenn a-berzh gecho111 d'an 22 May 2020 da 01:03
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Evezhiadenn a-berzh jimkats d'an 24 May 2020 da 12:03
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.