I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Discussion
په 19 May 2020 په 11:39 باندې د Vincent de Phily تبصره
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
په 22 May 2020 په 01:03 باندې د gecho111 تبصره
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
په 24 May 2020 په 12:03 باندې د jimkats تبصره
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.