I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
OpenStreetMap
Umræða
Athugasemd eftir Vincent de Phily sett inn 19. maí 2020 kl. 11:39
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
Athugasemd eftir gecho111 sett inn 22. maí 2020 kl. 01:03
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Athugasemd eftir jimkats sett inn 24. maí 2020 kl. 12:03
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.