I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Thảo luận
Bình luận của Vincent de Phily vào 19 tháng 05 năm 2020 lúc 11:39
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
Bình luận của gecho111 vào 22 tháng 05 năm 2020 lúc 01:03
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Bình luận của jimkats vào 24 tháng 05 năm 2020 lúc 12:03
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.