I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Discussione
Commento di Vincent de Phily il 19 maggio 2020 alle 11:39
Why restrict yourself ? There are other sources at our disposal, and Bing isn’t always the best.
Commento di gecho111 il 22 maggio 2020 alle 01:03
I often use Bing when scrolling around because it loads faster. But the Maxar imagery for my area is 3 years newer, and often sharper. For a really close look I’m lucky enough to have super high resolution aerial photography taken in the spring before the leaves open, so I can actually see what is beneath the canopy. Though that last option is the slowest because of the city’s webserver.
Commento di jimkats il 24 maggio 2020 alle 12:03
Bing’s aerial imagery is outdated and low quality. I usually cross-check with Google’s aerial imagery which is higher quality and more recent.